Green's theorem for finding area.

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
mathman44
Messages
204
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use GT to find the area of one petal of the 8-leafed rose given by

[tex]r=17sin(\theta)[/tex]

Recall that the area of a region D enclosed by a curve C can be found by
[tex]A=1/2\int(xdy - ydx)[/tex]

I calculated it using the parametrization

[tex]x=rcos(\theta), y=rcos(\theta)[/tex]

And I found a really long integral, evaluated it from 0 to pi/4, and got the correct answer.
Here is my question: apparently, if x is defined as above, and I find

[tex]dx = -rsin(\theta), dy = rcos(\theta)[/tex], then the integral

[tex]A=1/2\int(xdy - ydx)[/tex] simplifies nicely to [tex]1/2\int(r^2)d\theta[/tex]. Evaluating this integral again from 0 to pi/4 gives the correct answer.

So... why is it that I can pretend "r" is a constant when I'm evalutating dx and dy, when really, r is dependent on theta just as the x and y parametrizations are?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathman44 said:
Why is it that I can pretend "r" is a constant when I'm evalutating dx and dy, when really, r is dependent on theta just as the x and y parametrizations are?
Simple answer: You can't really. If you work it out properly, you'll see the terms proportional to dr cancel out. It's just a coincidence.