How Much Propylmagnesium Bromide is Needed for This Grignard Reaction?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the amount of a 0.50M solution of propylmagnesium bromide needed for the Grignard reaction, first establish the molar ratio between the starting material and the Grignard reagent. The user is struggling with balancing the reaction, initially calculating an imbalance in carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen atoms. It is suggested to focus on the molar ratio rather than exact balancing, as the Grignard reaction specifics may not yet be covered in class. Once the correct ratio is identified, the required amount can be calculated, including a 15% excess of the reagent. The final step involves predicting the product yield based on an anticipated 78% efficiency.
ampersand15
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm in organic chemistry 1. We haven't gone over the Grignard reaction in class, but there was a stoichiometry problem assigned about one and I don't know how to get it started.

Homework Statement



The following Grignard reaction is performed.

RsxY7.jpg


Calculate how much of a 0.50M solution of propylmagnesium bromide is required to react completely with 25g of the starting material. Assume you need a 15% excess of the Grignard reagent. Then predict the amount of product based upon a 78% yield.


Homework Equations



If I can get past the first step it's just dimensional analysis.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm having trouble at the first step, balancing the reaction. I end up with 7C, 16H, 2O, 1Mg, 1Br on the reactant side, and 7C, 14H, 2O, 1Mg, and 1Br on the product side. The only thing I can do that balances the equation is to ignore the H3O+. Is this what I'm supposed to do? Not including H3O+ in the calculation leaves me with 7C, 13H, and 1O on both sides. I'm assuming this has something to do with the Grignard reaction that I haven't encountered yet?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't worry too much about exact reaction. First of all, check how the Grignard reagent works. The only information you need to solve is the molar ratio between butenal and propylmagnesium bromide.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top