I Grip Strength: Comparing Pressure Needed to Hold 20kg Weight Plate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on comparing grip strength required to hold a 20kg weight plate directly versus holding it via a wooden block with a hook. Observations suggest that holding the weight through the block is significantly more challenging. Key factors include the structural design of the weight plate, which allows for easier gripping due to its rim, and the difference in thickness between the two objects, affecting the applied force needed. Additionally, there are concerns about the coefficient of friction differing between the metal plate and the wood, impacting grip effectiveness. Overall, the consensus leans towards the idea that more force is needed to hold the weight in the second scenario.
jjirving
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am interested to compare two scenarios relating to grip strength and how much horizontal pressure will be required to hold the weight.

Scenario 1: You have a 20kg weight plate in one piece. You hold the plate between your fingers.

Scenario 2: You are holding a small 2X4 block of wood with a hook on the bottom attached to a weight plate.

Assume both materials have the same surface tension, and assume both apparatus are calibrated to exactly the same weight.

Will the same pressure need to be applied to hold the weight? I don't have an answer for this other than observationally it appears significantly harder with scenario 2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

jjirving said:
I am interested to compare two scenarios relating to grip strength and how much horizontal pressure will be required to hold the weight.

Scenario 1: You have a 20kg weight plate in one piece. You hold the plate between your fingers.

Scenario 2: You are holding a small 2X4 block of wood with a hook on the bottom attached to a weight plate.

Assume both materials have the same surface tension, and assume both apparatus are calibrated to exactly the same weight.

Will the same pressure need to be applied to hold the weight? I don't have an answer for this other than observationally it appears significantly harder with scenario 2.

A sketch or pictures would help to clarify what you are asking. And by "surface tension", do you mean the coefficient of friction?
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to PF.
A sketch or pictures would help to clarify what you are asking. And by "surface tension", do you mean the coefficient of friction?
I think that's what you mean. I don't have a physics background so I was hoping to get some help understanding the issue.

Scenario 1 is simply just holding the plate and we can assume the width is the same for the block as shown in the image which is the sort of setup I have for scenario 2.

sddefault.jpg
 
In terms of applied forces, if the coefficient of friction between your fingers and the wood is the same as that between your fingers and the metal then there is no difference in holding the apparatus in the picture by the wood (with the plate dangling) or the plate (with the wood dangling).

However, the plate has structure, and will be considerably easier to hold if your fingers are "hooked" under the rim. There is no rim to the wooden block so this cannot happen there. This would mean you'd have to apply less pinch force to the plate than you would for the same weight if it were a flat disc.

Also the plate is considerably thinner than the wooden block, and I think it's easier for your fingers to apply the same force to a thinner object than a thicker one. You could test this by looping a chain or rope through two identical plates and trying to pinch two of them stacked together or one hanging from the other (so you'd have the same weight and same coefficient of friction, but different thickness). I suspect you'll find the "one hanging" configuration easier to hold.

Also I have my doubts that the coefficient of friction is the same with the wood and the plate. The paint on the weight looks quite rough, probably as a deliberate aid to gripping it - the manufacturers don't want to drop it on your toes while you're attaching it to a bar. The wood doesn't look exactly polished, but looks to be cleanly cut and quite smooth.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top