Ground State Symmetry of Single Electron w/ Non-Interacting 2nd Electron

AI Thread Summary
In a symmetrical potential, the ground state wavefunction of a single electron is symmetric due to its lowest average energy configuration, which minimizes kinetic energy by having a flatter slope. When a second non-interacting electron is added, it shares the same wavefunction as the first because both electrons occupy the same spatial state, respecting the symmetry of the potential. The discussion assumes a one-dimensional scenario, where the Schrödinger equation has been solved to find bound states. The lowest energy state available for the second electron remains the ground state, considering its spin-1/2 nature. Thus, both electrons can occupy the same symmetric ground state wavefunction in this configuration.
positron
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
for a symmetrical potential with one electron, i know that the wavefunctions are symmetric or antisymmetric. for the ground state why is the wavefunction symmetric?

Also, if you add a second electron that is non-interacting, (why) does it have the same wavefunction as the first electron?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume we are talking 1d here? So you've solved the 1d Schrodinger equation and have obtained the bound states of the system, right? You've put your first electron into the ground state, now what is the lowest energy single particle state available to the next electron? (Hint: the electron has spin 1/2)
 
Physics Monkey said:
I assume we are talking 1d here? So you've solved the 1d Schrodinger equation and have obtained the bound states of the system, right? You've put your first electron into the ground state, now what is the lowest energy single particle state available to the next electron? (Hint: the electron has spin 1/2)

Yes, the problem is in 1-D. The potential is a general symmetric potential, so we don't know necessarily have an actual analytical solution to Schrodinger equation. So how do we know the ground state must be symmetric, and that if we put another electron in the potential, it has the same wave function?
 
positron said:
for a symmetrical potential with one electron, i know that the wavefunctions are symmetric or antisymmetric. for the ground state why is the wavefunction symmetric?

An intuitive explanation:

It's because the ground state has the smallest average energy. Energy in QM comes from two places, potential energy and kinetic energy. If you look at the form of the KE operator you will see that KE is smallest when your wave function slope is least (more flat). So the ground state only has one hump. That is, the more humps you got the more you have to go up and down and the higher the slopes.

Carl
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top