Ground state wavefunction real?

krishna mohan
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
Hi..

In a textbook, the ground-state wavefunction for any general Hamiltonian was under consideration. Then, a statement was made that this wave function is real since it is the ground state.

Is it true that one can always choose the ground state wave function to be real?

I understand that absolute phases don't matter in quantum physics, but relative phases do. Is it that one can choose the ground state wavefunction to be real and, as a consequence, lose the freedom of choosing the phases for the other wavefunctions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
krishna mohan said:
Hi..

In a textbook, the ground-state wavefunction for any general Hamiltonian was under consideration. Then, a statement was made that this wave function is real since it is the ground state.

Is it true that one can always choose the ground state wave function to be real?

This is always the case if the Hamiltonian has real coefficients and no first order spatial derivatives. In this case, for any eigenfunction psi of H to the eigenvalue E, Re psi and
Im psi have the same property and are real. In particular, if the ground state is nondegenerate, Re psi and I am psi must be proportional, which means that the ground state is a constant multiple of a real function.
 
I understand the rest of it...

But why should there be no first order derivatives?
 
krishna mohan said:
why should there be no first order derivatives?

For simplicity, and since this holds for many concrete Hamiltonians.

The more general statement is that everything holds when the Hamiltonian, expressed in terms of the quantum position and momentum operators, has only real coefficients.
 
I take it you mean the solution to the time independent schordinger equation(TISE). If that is the case, then not just the ground state, any solution can be taken to be real. If psi is a solution of the TISE, then so is its complex conjugate psi* (do it and check it, this is so because the potential is taken to bereal). Since the differential equation is linear, you can now take any linear combination of psi and psi* as it will also be a solution to TISE.

So you make your life easier by choosing psi+psi* and choosing a real wavefunction.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Back
Top