I Group of Wave Vector for k - Action of Space Group

hokhani
Messages
561
Reaction score
18
For a specific wave vector, ##k##, the group of wave vector is defined as all the space group operations that leave ##k## invariant or turn it into ##k+K_m## where ##K_m## is a reciprocal vector. How the translation parts of the space group, ##\tau##, can act on wave vector? Better to say, the dimension of a wave vector is ##1/length## while the translation operator acts on the lengths!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are using the word space in space group as physical space. You can have space group symmetries without having dimensions of length.

Your question makes me wonder if you know what a wave vector looks like in reciprocal space and what it represents in a wave function.
 
Dr_Nate said:
You are using the word space in space group as physical space. You can have space group symmetries without having dimensions of length.

Your question makes me wonder if you know what a wave vector looks like in reciprocal space and what it represents in a wave function.
Many thanks for your answer.
I don't know about that. Could you please help me with how a translation operator ##\tau## act on a wave vector ##k##?
 
It sounds like you are trying to apply a spatial-translation operator to reciprocal space. There's more than one type of translation operator. For example, there is also a time-translation operator. Instead you want a translation operator specific to reciprocal space.
 
Dr_Nate said:
It sounds like you are trying to apply a spatial-translation operator to reciprocal space. There's more than one type of translation operator. For example, there is also a time-translation operator. Instead you want a translation operator specific to reciprocal space.
My question still remains.
 
It's real easy. You've pretty much gave it in your original post. Just write out the definition for a spatial-translation operation for a crystal and just substitute the appropriate variables that are in reciprocal space.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top