Group Theory and Energy Eigenstates in Quantum Mechanics

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
praharmitra
Messages
308
Reaction score
1
I have only recently begun to study group theory from Lie Algebra for Particle Physicists by Georgi. I am slightly confused about the language used by physicists.

What does it mean when the following is stated

"The energy eigenstates transform like irreducible representations of the group G"

(G is a transformation group that is a symmetry of a quantum mechanical system.

Does it mean that if u take irreducible representations of the group G (which are linear operators) and act them on the energy eigenstates, you get new eigenstates with the same energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The language physicists use in the area is quite a bit different from how mathematicians would say it.

The eigenstates are vectors, say of ##V##. Then the group ##G## as well as its Lie algebra ##\mathfrak{g}## act on ##\mathfrak{gl}(V)## e.g. via the adjoint representations if ##V=\mathfrak{g}##. I assume that we have the latter here, i.e. ##\varphi\, : \,\mathfrak{g} \longrightarrow \mathfrak{gl}(V)##. So if we have any representation ##(V,\varphi)## of ##\mathfrak{g}##, then, since ##\mathfrak{g}## is semisimple, ##V=V^{(1)}\oplus \ldots V^{(m)}## splits into irreducible subspaces ##V^{(k)}##, i.e. ##\{\,0\,\}## and ##V^{(k)}## are the only ##\varphi-##invariant subspaces. Nevertheless, the ##V^{(k)}## split into a direct sum ##V^{(k)}=V^{(k)}_1\oplus \ldots \oplus V^{(k)}_{n_k}## of subspaces which are invariant under the CSA of ##\mathfrak{g}## and the root spaces of ##\mathfrak{g}## shift vectors from on ##V^{(k)}_i## to another ##V^{(k)}_j##. The energy eigenstates are represented by those irreducible components ##V^{(k)}##.