Guidance or tutorial of applying pseudo-material method

AI Thread Summary
The pseudo-material method modifies the MCNP material card in the input file by adjusting the number density of materials to approximate a desired cross section. For example, to achieve a cross section for Lithium at 500 degrees, one would combine fractions of the cross sections at 400 and 600 degrees. An equation for determining these fractions is available in a referenced paper. The discussion also suggests considering the on-the-fly Doppler broadening method for obtaining cross sections at specific temperatures. The MCNP email forum is recommended for further inquiries on this topic.
GeorgeChen92
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm working on a project of coupled simulation involving MCNP and Fluent, and having trouble with how to apply the pseudo-material method in cross section handling. Is there any related material or tutorial? Or, does anyone know the procedure of applying the method and what kind of files the method actually modifies(e.g. xsdir or the material card in mcnp input file)?
 
GeorgeChen92 said:
Hi, I'm working on a project of coupled simulation involving MCNP and Fluent, and having trouble with how to apply the pseudo-material method in cross section handling. Is there any related material or tutorial? Or, does anyone know the procedure of applying the method and what kind of files the method actually modifies(e.g. xsdir or the material card in mcnp input file)?

The pseudo-material method modifies the MCNP material card in the MCNP input file. One would change the number density of the entries to reach an approximate mixture of materials with the same cross section as the desired material.

Eg if you wanted Lithium at 500 degrees and only had cross sections at 400 and 600 then you would add a fraction of both the 400 and 600 degree cross section.

There is an equation for finding the fraction of materials to add when making the pseudo-material http://neams.rpi.edu/jiw2/papers/ANS 92 Conlin.pdf

Are you planning on using pseudo-materials to get cross sections for particular temperatures? If so perhaps look at on the fly doppler broadening instead
http://www.casl.gov/docs/Martin.OTF.MC2013.Final.pdf

However sorts of questions are often answered on the MCNP email forum
https://laws.lanl.gov/vhosts/mcnp.lanl.gov/mcnp_forum.shtml
 
Toast said:
The pseudo-material method modifies the MCNP material card in the MCNP input file. One would change the number density of the entries to reach an approximate mixture of materials with the same cross section as the desired material.

Eg if you wanted Lithium at 500 degrees and only had cross sections at 400 and 600 then you would add a fraction of both the 400 and 600 degree cross section.

There is an equation for finding the fraction of materials to add when making the pseudo-material http://neams.rpi.edu/jiw2/papers/ANS 92 Conlin.pdf

Are you planning on using pseudo-materials to get cross sections for particular temperatures? If so perhaps look at on the fly doppler broadening instead
http://www.casl.gov/docs/Martin.OTF.MC2013.Final.pdf

However sorts of questions are often answered on the MCNP email forum
https://laws.lanl.gov/vhosts/mcnp.lanl.gov/mcnp_forum.shtml

Thanks for your reply. I've read about the solution I was looking for and the OTF method you mentioned in other expertises. I think pseudo-material method should be sufficient in solving my problem but there's still a lot of work to be done for me to realize the method with scripts written with c++. Again, thanks for your help.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top