Had you changed to another major?

  • Thread starter Thread starter morrobay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Major
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the regrets and reflections of individuals regarding their choice of college majors, specifically between Biology and Chemistry. Participants share personal experiences, emphasizing that a Chemistry degree is often viewed as more advantageous than a Biology degree, particularly for those not pursuing field biology. They highlight the importance of aligning one's major with personal interests and the potential benefits of pursuing a second degree to create unique career opportunities. The conversation also touches on how the availability of information online can aid in exploring diverse career paths.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of undergraduate degree structures, specifically BS and BA distinctions.
  • Familiarity with the significance of Chemistry and Biology in scientific careers.
  • Knowledge of interdisciplinary fields, such as biochemistry and medical physics.
  • Awareness of career development resources available online.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the career opportunities available for Chemistry majors versus Biology majors.
  • Explore interdisciplinary fields that combine Biology and Chemistry, such as biochemistry.
  • Investigate the impact of online resources on career exploration and decision-making.
  • Learn about the benefits of pursuing dual degrees or minors in related fields.
USEFUL FOR

Students contemplating their college majors, career advisors, and professionals considering a career change or further education in the sciences.

morrobay
Gold Member
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
1,807
I completed BS Biology, San Diego State, but regret not being a Chemistry major. Seems I took the path of least resistance, somewhat anyway. The BS was 36 upper division Biology semester units , the BA 24 units. I got all B,s in Chemistry and a lot of C,s in Biology. San Diego state required one year calculus , one year physics and one year general (inorganic) chemistry, but i took more, organic and biochemistry + quant. analysis (summer) for unofficial minor.

So it would have taken me maybe 11/2 - 2 years more to complete the chemistry major. Unless one is interested in field biology (pop dynamics) a chemistry degree is "better" And since some schools do not even require any chemistry or physics for a BA in Biology the major is not all that respected.

I recall sitting in upper division genetics class,lab table with our data books writing up the experiment/conclusions on the genes responsible for the shape and color of fruit fly wings. As I was copying some of my lab partners write up a pre-dental student, sitting across, who was as interested in fruit flies as myself said he should have been a chemistry major. Looking back I should have , could have , would have dropped the class right there and gone down to change major to chemistry.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
Seek to combine your understanding. Students often find that their major doesn't exactly fit their interests or expectations and that the degree they got seems somehow wrong.

Consider going back and getting that second degree and then combine the two into a more novel career. Many great discoveries are made in the underexplored niches between majors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gleem, Klystron and BillTre
My major was EE, and it was a hard choice between Physics (my first love) and Engineering. After working in R&D for a few decades, I started working part-time in EMS (emergency medical services) and have found that I really enjoy the patient contacts (even with difficult patients, or patients who are badly injured or ill). If I'd have known back in undergrad how much I enjoy patient contacts, I would have gone into medicine, probably emergency medicine as a doc or a nurse. Ah well, that's for a different lifetime... :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gleem, Klystron, Wrichik Basu and 1 other person
In my case, I became a BS Physics major and had no complaint. I got a job as a "scientific" programmer where "scientific" meant writing Fortran code. Later I went back to grad school for physics again but switched to Comp Sci as my interests shifted to numerical simulations and in a sense combining my two interests of physics and computers. The computers won out though jobwise.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gleem, Klystron and Wrichik Basu
Let me skip back a few generations with an anecdote from my father's similar dilemma.

While physics was his true love he completed a degree in Chemistry just as WWII began. While serving as a "technical chemist" helping build the aviation fuel pipelines along the Ledo Road, he gained an interest in electronics. After moving to Cupertino, California (Silicon Valley), he completed an EE education though he insisted electronics and chemistry are parts of Physics. As I learned to read from his textbooks and with the constant admonition "realize the physics", I also regard electronics as an aspect of Physics.

Given your background in Biology and interests in Chemistry, you might find inspiration from biochemist Isaac Asimov. His books and essays relate bio-chem to modern physics and astronomy in marvelous ways.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and jedishrfu
I had thought of starting a thread like this. My interest in science started after we moved into the suburbs of Chicago where I could experience nature was up close and personal. I was fascinated by the new creatures that heretofore I had not even thought of. Creepy crawlies of the suburban wetlands fascinated me. Eventually I acquired a simple Gilbert microscope (60X) to get a closer look.

That stimulated me into checking out other interests like radio/electronics and as I remember telling a HS geometry teacher I would like to become an EE. My father had brought home from work the radio course taken by a co worker from the Devry Institute, one of those specialty technical colleges which I think is still in operation today. In reflecting other interests I was also fascinated by anthropology/archaeology and remember the Sunday morning watching programs from the American Natural History Museum in NYC and continued my interest in zoology faithfully watching Marlin Perkins' Zoo Parade. This evolved somehow into an interest in chemistry and eventually physics seeing them as more viable avenues for a career. Physics became eventually my first choice being the fundamental science a choice I have never regretted.

You never know where you might end up a fact that I try to impress on students. Careers are often not predictable and opportunities are presented periodically. If prepared you chose to accept them or not. In my case after receiving a PhD in experimental nuclear physics such an opportunity occurred in medical physics for which I was prepared to accept. In short it fit my needs. As I learned more about myself and other fields I have wondered about what might have happened

If I had more readily available information about some of the things that I found interesting during my formative years as is readily available on the internet now I wonder if I might have chosen a significantly different path.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and berkeman
Ive heard it said that schooling kills off almost all your interests and the last one left becomes your career.

I know a college lit course on scifi novels killed off my favorite nterest for at least ten years before i started reading them again and my excitement for them had changed too. It was a ten week course ie trimester system taught by an English lit teacher and a Physicist. We had to read 3 novels a week but i was lucky if i had the time to read just two. I passed but with many scars.
 
gleem said:
If I had more readily available information about some of the things that I found interesting during my formative years as is readily available on the internet now I wonder if I might have chosen a significantly different path.
That's a great point, and it applies to this thread by @morrobay here. The Internet really does open up more information about different career paths (including non-traditional ones, or switching career paths mid-life). Maybe that will help folks with exploring more options in their schoolwork and career path choices going forward. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K