Half-circle Parabolas: A Misconception?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CosmicVoyager
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parabola
AI Thread Summary
A half-circle is not a parabola, as circles have constant curvature while parabolas have non-constant curvature. The distinction lies in their definitions: a circle is the set of points equidistant from a center, while a parabola is defined by its relationship to a focus and a directrix. The intersection of a cone with a plane parallel to its axis creates a parabola, whereas a perpendicular plane forms a circle. Additionally, the eccentricity differentiates these conic sections, with parabolas having an eccentricity of 1 and circles having 0. Understanding these differences clarifies the misconception about their relationship.
CosmicVoyager
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
Greetings,

Is a half-circle a parabola? I am guessing yes because it is a conic section, the very bottom of the cone?

If yes, why aren't antenna dishes and telescope mirrors half-spheres? Wouldn't that be simpler?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No, it is not.

Circles have constant curvature at all points, parabolas have non-constant curvature.

As for your conic section argument, that would make hyperbolas into circles as well...

As a reminder:
A circle is the locus of points equidistant from a single point.
A parabola is the locus of points that have, individually, the same distance from a fixed point (the focus) and a fixed line (the directrix).

Since the definitions are not logically equivalent, nor are any part of the curves "the same", either.
 
No, a circle is not the same as a parabola.

A parabola is formed by the intersection of a cone and a plane parallel to the axis of the cone. A circle is formed when the intersecting plane is perpendicular to the axis of the cone.
 
This is a good question...most of the students may go baffle with this...
Actually, in conic sections, the main difference among parabaola, hyperbola and circle is their eccentricity. Eccentricity of parabola is 1 and that of the circle is 0.
For more info. about eccentricity.. check out this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eccentricity_(mathematics )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the answers. I understand now. I was thinking a parabola was a curve formed by a *any* plane intersecting the base and the side. Now I see the plane must be parallel to the side of the cone.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top