Half equation for S2O32-/S4O62- couple

  • Thread starter Thread starter kittassa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Couple
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on writing the half equation for the S2O32-/S4O62- redox couple, highlighting difficulties due to their identical ionic values. Two proposed equations are presented: the first includes water and sulfur, while the second focuses solely on stoichiometry and electrons. The second equation is noted to have a charge balance issue, although the first is questioned for its adherence to conventional practices in redox equations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of balancing charges and the appropriate use of water and electrons in half equations. Ultimately, clarity on stoichiometry and charge balance is crucial for accurately representing the redox couple.
kittassa
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I need to write the half equation for the S2O32-/S4O62- redox couple but I'm having trouble because they have the same ioic value.

I've come up wth two solutions but am happy with nether...

S2O32- + 3H2O + S2= S4O62- + 6H+ + 6e-

or

2S2O32- = S4O62- + 2e-

I know that the second one is wrong because the charges don't balance, but I'm not sure that the first is right either because we generally only add water, or electrons to the equations, so I'm not sure that I can add the S2.

am i just being obtuse or?!?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try ignoring any use of water. Just concentrate on the stoichiometry and the use of electron(s).
 
the charges DO balance in the second one.

2S2O32- = -4

S4O62- + 2e- = -4
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top