Half-Plane in R^3: Explanation and Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of the equation θ = π/4 in various coordinate systems, specifically in relation to half-planes and full-planes. The consensus is that in cylindrical coordinates, where r is restricted to r ≥ 0, the surface described is indeed a half-plane for x ≥ 0. If r is allowed to be negative, the surface extends to form a full-plane, which includes points where x < 0. The inconsistency in texts regarding the treatment of r in polar and cylindrical coordinates is acknowledged, but the understanding of these concepts is affirmed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Cylindrical coordinates
  • Polar coordinates
  • Spherical coordinates
  • Understanding of mathematical surfaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the conventions of r in polar and cylindrical coordinates
  • Study the properties of surfaces in spherical coordinates
  • Explore the implications of negative values of r in polar coordinates
  • Learn about the rose curve and its leaves in polar coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying geometry and coordinate systems, as well as anyone interested in the properties of surfaces in three-dimensional space.

MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



Describe in words the surface whose equation is given by theta = pi/4

2. The attempt at a solution


It is a fairly simple question, but I'm just trying to understand why this is considered a half-plane that exists for x that is greater than or equal to 0. There are no restriction on r or z. Given this, cannot r be negative? Wouldn't this make a full-plane and let it extend for x less than 0? I just don't quite see why it cannot have the point (-1, pi/4, 0), for example, which would be present for x less than 0. Any feedback is always appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MathewsMD said:

Homework Statement



Describe in words the surface whose equation is given by theta = pi/4

2. The attempt at a solution


It is a fairly simple question, but I'm just trying to understand why this is considered a half-plane that exists for x that is greater than or equal to 0. There are no restriction on r or z. Given this, cannot r be negative? Wouldn't this make a full-plane and let it extend for x less than 0? I just don't quite see why it cannot have the point (-1, pi/4, 0), for example, which would be present for x less than 0. Any feedback is always appreciated!

First of all, you haven't told us what coordinate system you are using. ##\theta = \frac \pi 4## makes sense in 2D polar coordinates, 3D cylindrical coordinates, and in spherical coordinates. In spherical coordinates it might be a plane or cone, depending on what convention you use for ##\theta##.

But, to answer your question, you seem to understand what is going on perfectly well. Texts are inconsistent about whether or not ##r<0## is used in polar or cylindrical coordinates. If you are using the convention ##r\ge 0## you get a half plane as you say, and if ##r## is allowed to go negative you get the whole plane, as you understand. One problem with disallowing negative values of ##r## is that you don't see all 3 leaves of the rose ##r = \sin(3\theta)## for ##0\le\theta\le \pi##.

I wouldn't worry too much about this if I were you since you understand it just fine.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MathewsMD

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K