Hamiltonian for 2 Particles with Angular Momentum

AI Thread Summary
The Hamiltonian for two particles with angular momentum is expressed as \(\hat{H} = \epsilon [ \hat{\bf{j}}_1 \times \hat{\bf{j}}_2 ]^2\), where \(\epsilon\) is a constant. It is established that this Hamiltonian is a Hermitian scalar. The user attempted to simplify it using suffix notation but encountered difficulties due to non-commuting terms. A suggested approach involves using the identity for the dot product of angular momentum operators to facilitate further simplification. This method is recommended for progressing towards finding the energy spectrum.
silmaril89
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The Hamiltonian for two particles with angular momentum j_1 and j_2 is given by:
\hat{H} = \epsilon [ \hat{\bf{j}}_1 \times \hat{\bf{j}}_2 ]^2,
where \epsilon is a constant. Show that the Hamiltonian is a Hermitian scalar and find the energy spectrum.

Homework Equations



Not really any specific to put here.

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried simplifying the Hamiltonian using suffix notation with the Einstein summation convention. I was able to get the following:
\hat{H} = \epsilon [( \hat{\bf{j}}_1 \cdot \hat{\bf{j}}_1) ( \hat{\bf{j}}_2 \cdot \hat{\bf{j}}_2) - \hat{j}_{1 i} ( \hat{\bf{j}}_2 \cdot \hat{\bf{j}}_1) \hat{j}_{2 i}].

Now I have the problem that since \hat{j}_{2i} doesn't commute with ( \hat{\bf{j}}_2 \cdot \hat{\bf{j}}_1), I can't simplify the Hamiltonian further. I'm not sure what my next steps should be.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is quite a common trick for this kinds of things, you can always express the dot product of two angular momentums as

J_1\cdot\J_2=\frac{1}{2}((J_1+J_2)^2-J_1^2-J_2^2)

The operators on the right hand side are easy to handle.

Hope this helps.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top