Hamiltonian of spin 1/2 in tangential magnetic field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Hamiltonian for a spin-1/2 particle in a tangential magnetic field is derived from the standard spin-orbit coupling, expressed as -\mathbf{\mu}_0 \cdot \mathbf{B}. The magnetic moment \mathbf{\mu}_0 is defined as -\mu \mathbf{S}/\hbar, where \mu represents the magnetic moment and \mathbf{S} is the spin operator represented by Pauli matrices. The constants in the Hamiltonian can be absorbed into the prefactor by redefining \mu, simplifying the expression. The article assumes \hbar is set to 1 for convenience.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with spin-1/2 particles
  • Knowledge of Pauli matrices
  • Concept of spin-orbit coupling
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Hamiltonian for spin-1/2 particles in magnetic fields
  • Explore the implications of setting \hbar to 1 in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the physical significance of magnetic moments in quantum systems
  • Investigate advanced topics in spin-orbit coupling in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers studying spin dynamics in magnetic fields will benefit from this discussion.

johnsmi
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have this article in which I saw that for a spin 1/2 particle confined to move along a ring positiond in a magnetic field with a z and \varphi

The Hamiltonian is given by: (in second attacment)
What I do not understand is how do you get the last term in the Hamiltonian.

Any help?

Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    7.6 KB · Views: 532
  • 2.JPG
    2.JPG
    10.7 KB · Views: 504
Physics news on Phys.org
It comes from the standard spin-orbit coupling between the particle's magnetic moment, usually written as -\mathbf{\mu}_0\cdot \mathbf{B}. You can find a treatment on this in any book on quantum mechanics. Here, \mathbf{\mu}_0 is the magnetic moment of the spin-1/2 particle (not equal to the \mu used in your text)

Now, to obtain the form they use you use the fact that you are dealing with spin-1/2. In that case the magnetic moment \mathbf{\mu}_0 can be written as -\mu \mathbf{S}/\hbar, where \mu is, again, called the magnetic moment (confusing!). Furthermore, \mathbf{S} is the spin operator which for spin-1/2 particles can be represented by the pauli matrices:

\mathbf{S} = (S_x,S_y,S_z) = \frac{\hbar}{2}(\sigma_x,\sigma_y,\sigma_z)

Plugging this into the spin-orbit coupling reproduces the term from the article, up to some constants. But you can absorb these all into the prefactor by redefining \mu (since this is just some numerical value anyway). Hope this helps!
 
Thank you for your reply. By the way it was mentioned in the article that h bar was taken to be 1
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K