Hamiltonian of spin 1/2 in tangential magnetic field

johnsmi
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have this article in which I saw that for a spin 1/2 particle confined to move along a ring positiond in a magnetic field with a z and \varphi

The Hamiltonian is given by: (in second attacment)
What I do not understand is how do you get the last term in the Hamiltonian.

Any help?

Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    7.6 KB · Views: 518
  • 2.JPG
    2.JPG
    10.7 KB · Views: 497
Physics news on Phys.org
It comes from the standard spin-orbit coupling between the particle's magnetic moment, usually written as -\mathbf{\mu}_0\cdot \mathbf{B}. You can find a treatment on this in any book on quantum mechanics. Here, \mathbf{\mu}_0 is the magnetic moment of the spin-1/2 particle (not equal to the \mu used in your text)

Now, to obtain the form they use you use the fact that you are dealing with spin-1/2. In that case the magnetic moment \mathbf{\mu}_0 can be written as -\mu \mathbf{S}/\hbar, where \mu is, again, called the magnetic moment (confusing!). Furthermore, \mathbf{S} is the spin operator which for spin-1/2 particles can be represented by the pauli matrices:

\mathbf{S} = (S_x,S_y,S_z) = \frac{\hbar}{2}(\sigma_x,\sigma_y,\sigma_z)

Plugging this into the spin-orbit coupling reproduces the term from the article, up to some constants. But you can absorb these all into the prefactor by redefining \mu (since this is just some numerical value anyway). Hope this helps!
 
Thank you for your reply. By the way it was mentioned in the article that h bar was taken to be 1
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top