Hamiltonian Symmetry: Implications for Negative Energies and Potential

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sangoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energies Negative
Sangoku
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi, let be a Hamiltonian so its energies satisfy E(n)=-E(-n) for every n >0

then my question is does this imply certain symmetry of potential ?? i believe that V(x)=-V(-x) so in absolute value positive and negative energies have the same value.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume that by n you mean the quantum state number so that n=0 is the ground state. In that case, what does the negative number in E(-n) mean?
 
Here 'n' is some kind of label for the Energy levels for example:

E_{-2} = -0.6784356

E_{-1} = -0.000456

(if n is negative this means that energies will be negatives)

E_{1} = 1.23456

E_{2} =4.5676868

(if n is positive energies will be positive)

E_{0} = 0.4 (there is no ground state since if there are negative energies this means that operator H is 'unbounded' )
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top