Hard Science Fiction Fans: Recommendations & Farside by Ben Bova

AI Thread Summary
Hard science fiction fans are discussing various book recommendations, with Ben Bova's "Farside" highlighted as an enjoyable read. Notable mentions include works by authors like Stanislaw Lem, Greg Egan, and Andy Weir, particularly praising Egan for his rigorous scientific detail and Weir's engaging storytelling in "The Martian." The conversation also touches on the definition of hard sci-fi, debating whether elements like faster-than-light travel can still fit within the genre if presented believably. Additionally, several hard sci-fi films are recommended, including "Gravity," "Interstellar," and "Primer." Overall, the thread emphasizes a shared enthusiasm for scientifically grounded narratives in literature and film.
  • #51
David Weber does a good job with hard science fiction, also, Johnny Ringo, Larry Niven, Jerry Pournelle. The latter two collaborated on several excellent books, including
The Mote in God's Eye. Heinlein called that one "possibly the finest science fiction novel I have ever read". That's a damn good recommendation. Written in 1975, but nothing is dated. They even have tablets.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
AgentSmith said:
David Weber does a good job with hard science fiction, also, Johnny Ringo, Larry Niven, Jerry Pournelle. The latter two collaborated on several excellent books, including
The Mote in God's Eye. Heinlein called that one "possibly the finest science fiction novel I have ever read". That's a damn good recommendation. Written in 1975, but nothing is dated. They even have tablets.

I think the OP referred to Science Fiction, not Science Fascism.

Not hard in science, but hard in humanity, PK Dick is a great antidote to Pournelle et al

Up on the hardness scale would put Alastair Reynolds, hard to think of any other HSF writer that can actually write as well as he can
 
  • #53
meBigGuy said:
Ahhh... I understand. There is a fine line between explaining, and intelligently weaving the technology/science into the story (making it integral to the story). The story becomes about interacting with the science, not about explaining the science. Using the science to make a story is different from "explaining". If you can leave it out and not disrupt the storyline, then you should leave it out. (Just my opinion, as I am not a writer).

Excellent advice, that. A more shouty way of putting it might be thus: Don't Try To Explain Everything!

BWV said:
Up on the hardness scale would put Alastair Reynolds, hard to think of any other HSF writer that can actually write as well as he can

Having (finally) got round to making a start on one of Alastair Reynolds' SF novels - 'Pushing Ice' - that seems a very fair comment.
 
  • #54
If had had to pick the two novels that were the most fun for me to read, I would pick "pushing ice" and "snow crash". Not sure I can explain why though.
 
  • #55
BWV said:
I think the OP referred to Science Fiction, not Science Fascism.
(edited)

Your biased opinion not withstanding, these authors are science fiction writers.
 
Back
Top