Harmonic Functions: Why n>2 Condition Imposed

  • Thread starter Thread starter praharmitra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Harmonic
AI Thread Summary
The function f: ℝ^n → ℝ = |X|^{2-n} is harmonic only for n > 2 due to the properties of harmonic functions and the Laplace equation. For n = 1 and n = 2, the function does not meet the criteria of being twice continuously differentiable across its entire domain, particularly at the origin. The discussion highlights that while the function may satisfy the Laplace equation in lower dimensions, it fails to be harmonic due to singularities or discontinuities. The condition n > 2 ensures that the function is well-defined and behaves appropriately in the context of classical physics, particularly in electromagnetic theory. Understanding these mathematical constraints is essential for applying harmonic functions in physical applications.
praharmitra
Messages
308
Reaction score
1
the function f:\Re^n \rightarrow \Re = |X|^{2-n} is harmonic, but only for n > 2.

why is the condition n > 2 imposed. Isn't harmonic for all values of n??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shouldn't the domain be \mathbb{R}^n\setminus \{ 0 \}? Otherwise, said f could not even exist at 0, and hence is clearly not harmonic.
 
ya I'm sorry that is the domain...my mistake...

but still, why shoud n>2, why can't n = 1?..

note: n stands for dimension of the space and hence is an integer >=1
 
oh, is this classical physics? ;-)

Try what happens if n=1, is the function harmonic then?
 
of course it is classical physics. It plays a MAJOR role in electromagnetic theory. and the potential formulation of the theory.

for n = 1, it is harmonic as laplacian(|X|) = 0 right? so it satisfies.

but then, why put the condition n > 2. I have seen it in many books
 
well then calculus problems are classic physics problems aswell. Just trying to make sure you get help.

Now harmonic functions are functions which are continuously differentiable twice and satisfy Laplace equation.

So play around with the criterion for twice continuously differentiable.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top