Harmonic Functions: Why n>2 Condition Imposed

  • Thread starter Thread starter praharmitra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Harmonic
AI Thread Summary
The function f: ℝ^n → ℝ = |X|^{2-n} is harmonic only for n > 2 due to the properties of harmonic functions and the Laplace equation. For n = 1 and n = 2, the function does not meet the criteria of being twice continuously differentiable across its entire domain, particularly at the origin. The discussion highlights that while the function may satisfy the Laplace equation in lower dimensions, it fails to be harmonic due to singularities or discontinuities. The condition n > 2 ensures that the function is well-defined and behaves appropriately in the context of classical physics, particularly in electromagnetic theory. Understanding these mathematical constraints is essential for applying harmonic functions in physical applications.
praharmitra
Messages
308
Reaction score
1
the function f:\Re^n \rightarrow \Re = |X|^{2-n} is harmonic, but only for n > 2.

why is the condition n > 2 imposed. Isn't harmonic for all values of n??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shouldn't the domain be \mathbb{R}^n\setminus \{ 0 \}? Otherwise, said f could not even exist at 0, and hence is clearly not harmonic.
 
ya I'm sorry that is the domain...my mistake...

but still, why shoud n>2, why can't n = 1?..

note: n stands for dimension of the space and hence is an integer >=1
 
oh, is this classical physics? ;-)

Try what happens if n=1, is the function harmonic then?
 
of course it is classical physics. It plays a MAJOR role in electromagnetic theory. and the potential formulation of the theory.

for n = 1, it is harmonic as laplacian(|X|) = 0 right? so it satisfies.

but then, why put the condition n > 2. I have seen it in many books
 
well then calculus problems are classic physics problems aswell. Just trying to make sure you get help.

Now harmonic functions are functions which are continuously differentiable twice and satisfy Laplace equation.

So play around with the criterion for twice continuously differentiable.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top