Harnessing Energy Of Jet Streams---Is It Really Possible?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Scientists are actively exploring the potential to harness wind energy from jet streams, with estimates suggesting that only 1 percent of this energy could meet global energy demands. Two significant studies present contrasting views: Archer & Caldeira estimate a potential power generation of 1700 TW with negligible climatic impact, while Miller, Gans, & Kleidon argue for a maximum of 7.5 TW with catastrophic climatic consequences. The technology required for harnessing this energy is projected to take 10-20 years to develop, raising concerns about its feasibility and environmental implications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of jet stream dynamics and atmospheric circulation
  • Familiarity with renewable energy technologies
  • Knowledge of wind turbine design and engineering
  • Awareness of climate impact assessments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advancements in airborne wind turbine technology
  • Explore the implications of jet stream energy extraction on climate models
  • Investigate existing floating wind turbine projects and their operational mechanisms
  • Study the engineering challenges of deploying turbines at high altitudes
USEFUL FOR

Energy researchers, environmental scientists, renewable energy engineers, and policymakers interested in innovative energy solutions and their potential environmental impacts.

Paradox101
Messages
47
Reaction score
1
Here is something I read on a Wiki article:
"Scientists are investigating ways to harness the wind energy within the jet stream. According to one estimate, of the potential wind energy in the jet stream, only 1 percent would be needed to meet the world's current energy needs. The required technology would reportedly take 10–20 years to develop.[35] There are two major scientific articles about jet stream power. Archer & Caldeira[36] claim that the jet streams can generate the total power of 1700 TW, and that the climatic impact will be negligible. Miller, Gans, & Kleidon[37]claim that the jet streams can generate the total power of only 7.5 TW, and that the climatic impact will be catastrophic."

So, bottom line, can the kinetic energy of these fast moving winds(about 110 to 184 km/h) in the upper atmosphere(round about >12 km) be in any way harnessed? If so, how?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Paradox101 said:
can generate the total power of 1700 TW,
This is about double the total power estimated to be sustaining air movement/atmospheric circulation, therefore, unlikely.
Paradox101 said:
7.5 TW, and that the climatic impact will be catastrophic.
Tune in the weather sometime, and watch the "troughs and ridges" in the jet stream moving across the country steering weather patterns. "Catastrophic?" Might be a bit overstated, but some caution in engineering circulation patterns is advisable.
 
Paradox101 said:
So, bottom line, can the kinetic energy of these fast moving winds(about 110 to 184 km/h) in the upper atmosphere(round about >12 km) be in any way harnessed? If so, how?

Since these scientists estimate it will take 10-20 years to develop the technology necessary to harness the power of the jet stream, my guess is they don't have a clue, either. :wink:

then_a_miracle_occurs.jpg
 
oh...well thanx
 
It is an interesting concept, but I do have concerns that this may have planetary scale weather effects. There are also issues of getting large wind turbines to high enough altitude that can produce a reasonable amount of power. And let's not forget taking that power and transferring it to the ground. There are some floating wind turbines in existence today, though I do not know much about them.
 
Floating as to floating on water or levitating in the air?-----http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airborne_wind_turbine
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Czcibor

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
16K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
10K
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K