Hartle's Gravity: Read it Before Special Relativity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Goldbeetle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
AI Thread Summary
Reading Hartle's book on general relativity is best approached after gaining a solid understanding of special relativity (SR). While Hartle does cover SR, prior exposure is essential for grasping concepts effectively, particularly the manipulation of Lorentz factors and the 4-vector formulation. The discussion highlights the recommendation of starting with "Spacetime Physics," especially the first edition, as a foundational text. Additionally, "A Traveller's Guide to Spacetime" is noted as an excellent resource, alongside "Spacetime Physics" and a book by French, indicating a preference for texts that provide exercises and solutions to reinforce learning.
Goldbeetle
Messages
210
Reaction score
1
Has anybody read the book? Is it just me or it would be better to read before a book on special relativity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, I'd suggest a book on special relativity before tackling Hartle, though Hartle does cover SR. If you're finding that section of his book difficult, I'd suggest, as usual, the red paperback first edition of Spacetime Physics.
 
You should definitely have had some exposure to SR before going through Hartle's Gravity. Even exposure on the level of simply manipulating lorentz factors and whatnot is very helpful before presented with the 4-vector formulation of everything. The book is, after all, an introduction to general relativity, and just quickly glosses over stuff from SR as a refresher/analogy to GR.
 
Thanks. I'm reading "A Traveller's Guide to Spacetime" and it's excellent. I also have "Spacetime Physics" (first red paperback edition with exercises and solutions" and the book by French.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top