Has anyone studied Equilibrium thermodynamics by CJ Adkin?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the book "Equilibrium Thermodynamics" by CJ Adkin, with participants sharing their experiences and challenges related to understanding the material and its exercises. The scope includes conceptual understanding and specific questions about thermodynamics principles and problems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks help with exercises from the book, indicating difficulty in understanding certain concepts.
  • Another participant questions the terminology of "Equilibrium Thermodynamics," suggesting it may be contradictory.
  • A participant mentions that the book discusses fundamental laws of thermodynamics, such as the Carnot engine.
  • There are suggestions for asking specific questions to receive meaningful help, emphasizing the importance of clarity in communication.
  • One participant expresses frustration over the lack of specific questions from the original poster, urging them to clarify their understanding and the points of confusion.
  • Apologies are exchanged, with the original poster acknowledging their newness to the forum and promising to be more precise in future posts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for specific questions to facilitate effective discussion, but there is no consensus on the best approach to understanding the book's content or the terminology used.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that questions about specific exercises should be directed to appropriate forums, indicating a potential limitation in the scope of this discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in thermodynamics, particularly those studying CJ Adkin's "Equilibrium Thermodynamics," may find this discussion relevant, especially if they are facing similar challenges in understanding the material.

Nasbah BM
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I was hoping if anyone has studied it ,I might get help especially regarding its exercise.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I have not, but I have to make the comment here ... Isn't "Equilibrium Thermodynamics" a bit of an oxymoron?
 
I guess but it mainly discusses laws of thermodynamics carnot engine etc
 
So, what's your question? Do you not want any help from anyone else except those who have used CJ Adkin?
 
Actually em studying this book now a days and i understand the theory but when it comes to questions , its hard to understand and proceed. hoping may be because of concepts I am not getting it . Want to clear my concepts . :)
 
Well, if you want meaningful help here you have to ask specific questions. Conceptual questions or clarifications about thermodynamics are OK in this forum if they're really basic, or in the Classical Physics forum if they're more advanced. Questions about specific exercises belong in one of the "Homework and Coursework Questions" forums.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller
Nasbah BM said:
Actually em studying this book now a days and i understand the theory but when it comes to questions , its hard to understand and proceed. hoping may be because of concepts I am not getting it . Want to clear my concepts . :)

You posted this on Monday, and by Thursday, you STILL have not provided any concise description of what exactly is the nature of your problem.

Here's how to use this forum, since you are new here:

1. Don't ask to ask! Just ask! Find the appropriate forum, as instructed by jtbell, and ASK AWAY!

2. Don't beat around the bush. 4 full days since you posted the first post in this thread, and it still hasn't gotten out of first base and has gone nowhere. This is a waste of time and patience.

3. Ask something specific! Don't just ask for whole lessons that are covered in class or in textbooks. That is not the most effective way to use a forum like this.

4. Don't just say that you don't understand. What exactly don't you understand? Where exactly did you stop understanding? You must understand something! Go back to where you understand stuff, and then trace where this understanding stopped. Then tell us that point. This shows us what you know, and what you don't, so that the explanation given can build ON TOP of what you do know! Otherwise, we might tell you something you can't comprehend, and we have to keep retreating and retracing the steps. I find such practice very aggravating very quickly.

5. Tell us exactly what you have attempted. Telling us "I don't know where to start" or "I don't know how to solve this" tells us nothing on what you do know and where you got stuck.

6. Be concise, precise, and descriptive. In this post alone, I've typed more than what you've typed in all your previous posts in this thread combined!

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: micromass, rumborak, jerromyjon and 1 other person
My apologies ! and sorry I am actually new here . I will be careful and precise next time, should I remove my post from here?
 
Nasbah BM said:
My apologies ! and sorry I am actually new here . I will be careful and precise next time, should I remove my post from here?
No. But, if you have any specific questions, please start new threads.
 
  • #10
OK, Sure n thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K