Have 2 Questions: Measure Perihelion of Venus & Pendulum in Elevator

  • Thread starter Thread starter leafvillage
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Measuring the perihelion advance of Venus is challenging due to the influence of gravitational perturbations from other planets and relativistic effects that complicate precise calculations. In the scenario of a pendulum in a falling elevator, the pendulum would remain stationary relative to the elevator, as both are in free fall, creating a weightless environment. The discussion emphasizes that these questions may not be suitable for a relativity-focused forum, suggesting they are more appropriate for a general physics or homework section. Participants note the importance of considering factors like air resistance and initial conditions for accurate analysis. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of gravitational interactions and motion in non-inertial reference frames.
leafvillage
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
URGENT: Have 2 questions

I got 2 questions, if anyone can answer one or both of them, ill appreciate it. thanks!
8. Why is it difficult to measure the perihelion advance of the planet Venus?
9. You are in an elevator at the top of the CN tower. You have a pendulum
and allow it to oscillate. The elevator falls to the ground after someone
cuts its support cables. What does the pendulum do? Ignore the air
resistance acting on the pendulum and the elevator.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If these are homework problems, you should post them in one of the homework forums, not here (they have nothing to do with relativity, anyway).
 
i thought these questiosn belonged to the relativity section bout space time and such...sry
 
I believe u would need to consider air resistance and the position at which the pendulum was at.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top