Have you found a solution for the pain of bone marrow biopsies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pmb_phy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Bone marrow biopsies are known for causing significant pain, prompting discussions on potential mechanical solutions to alleviate discomfort. One suggestion involves a specialized needle design developed by a biomedical engineer, featuring a rotating inner needle that minimizes pain but still causes discomfort. The conversation also touches on the idea of creating an access port in the bone to avoid repeated procedures, though concerns about bone overgrowth present challenges. While some mechanical solutions exist, they do not eliminate the pain entirely, indicating ongoing research and development is needed. Overall, the quest for improved methods to reduce pain during bone marrow biopsies remains a relevant topic in medical discussions.
pmb_phy
Messages
2,950
Reaction score
1
Are any of you familiar with a bone marrow biopsy? Is so then you're familiar with the enourmous amount of pain it causes.

Have any of you tried to solve this problems utilizing mechanics.

Pete
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I will get back to you in about 10 years

I should have my Ph.D in Biophysics by then.

Jeremy
 
Well there is a simpel mechanical solution to this probleme it's derived from Newtons 3'rd law and it seas that no action couses no reaction. So if no bone marrow biopsy is preformed it couses no paine. Aldo this solutions does have a small problem, all the benefits of a bone marrow biopsy are lost. :smile:
 
My cousin was a biomedical engineer in New Jersey, and developed a more comfortable needle over 20 years ago. I don't know how widespread its use is, but it involved a rotating inner needle with a razor-sharp bevelled tip that bored into the bone like a hole-saw rather than punching through. Still hurt like hell, but it was an improvement. I wouldn't have much of a clue about how to approach something like this other than maybe Teflon-coating the parts or adding an electrical discharge to block local transmission of pain impulses.
 
Last edited:
Dang Pete, you going through that again? Will see what I can find.
 
Chronos' post leads me to suspect that this is an on-going experience for you. My sympathies. If you have to undergo it regularly, I'd think that it should be possible to install an access port in the bone itself that could be tapped into instead of having to make new holes every time. How to prevent the bone from over-growing it could be a nasty problem. I can't help thinking that there must be some insurmountable obstacles to it, though, or they'd already be doing it.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top