Have you tried using a laser system for distance and location measurements?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dingpud
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lasers Practical
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the use of laser systems for distance and location measurements, specifically highlighting the importance of matched pairs of laser emitters and receivers. Participants recommend using Avalanche Photodiodes (APDs) for high-speed and sensitive detection in time-of-flight laser ranging applications. The conversation also covers two primary methods of laser range finding: time-of-flight and phase measurement techniques, each suited for different distance and accuracy requirements. Various resources and products, including laser range finders and laser measuring tools, are shared to assist users in their search for effective laser measurement solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Avalanche Photodiodes (APDs) and their applications
  • Familiarity with time-of-flight and phase measurement techniques
  • Knowledge of laser emitter and receiver pairing
  • Basic principles of laser range finding technology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specifications and applications of Avalanche Photodiodes (APDs)
  • Explore time-of-flight laser ranging systems and their components
  • Investigate phase measurement techniques for laser distance measurement
  • Examine commercially available laser range finders and their use cases in surveying
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, researchers, and hobbyists interested in laser measurement technology, particularly those involved in surveying, civil engineering, and precision measurement applications.

dingpud
Messages
198
Reaction score
1
Has anyone had any experience in using a laser system for measuring distance or location?

I am looking for the laser emitter as well as the receiver as kind of like a matched pair. I haven't really been able to find anything other than laser emitters on their own, and wanted to know if anyone has used a laser "system"

any links anyone has would be great...

thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
For time-of-flight laser ranging you typically use APDs for the detector because you need high speed and sensitivity, you also need a timing chip capable of resolving a few 10pS.
Or buy something like this http://www.mdl.co.uk/laser_modules/laserace-im/index.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yep, Photodiode, that's what I'm looking for.

Perfect, thanks.

pud
 
mgb_phys said:
For time-of-flight laser ranging you typically use APDs for the detector because you need high speed and sensitivity, you also need a timing chip capable of resolving a few 10pS. [/url]

Interesting -- Avalanche Photodiode (APD) -- I need to read more about how to use them. This is an interesting link I came across while googling laser APD:

http://www.analogmodules.com/Data_sht/7500.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dingpud said:
Has anyone had any experience in using a laser system for measuring distance or location?

I am looking for the laser emitter as well as the receiver as kind of like a matched pair. I haven't really been able to find anything other than laser emitters on their own, and wanted to know if anyone has used a laser "system"

any links anyone has would be great...

thanks

Not sure if this is what you are looking for but I have one of these for measuring distance.

http://www.stanleytools.com/default.asp?CATEGORY=LASER+MEASURING&TYPE=PRODUCT&PARTNUMBER=77-910&SDesc=TLM+100+FatMax%26%23153%3B+Tru%2DLaser%26%23153%3B+Distance+Measurer

CS
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Laser range finders are popular in surveying and civil engineering.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_range-finder
http://www.opticsplanet.net/rangefinders1.html
http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~twd25/webcam_laser_ranger.html
http://www.acroname.com/robotics/info/articles/laser/laser.html
http://www.seattlerobotics.org/encoder/200110/vision.htm

Tunnels, small tubes, and tubular geometries in between are profiled with laser profilometers.


http://www.asnt.org/publications/materialseval/solution/apr99solution/apr99sol.htm
http://www.ndt.net/article/v04n02/roberts3/roberts3.htm
http://www.solarius-inc.com/html/laser.html

In some industries, precision measurements are made with laser mircometers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are two main ways of doing laser range finders.

Time of flight = fire a short (ns) infrared laser pulse and start a clock, when the return pulse is detected by a photodiode you stop the clock. Divide c=3E8 m/s by the time = distance. This is useful for long range (upto several km) but lower accuracy (a few cm) and is fast (100,000 points/s) it's used for imaging scanners and laser-radar.

Phase = transmit a continual visible beam varying in brightness sinusoidally at a few kHz. Measure the brightness of the returned beam and compare the phase difference.
From the phase you can tell what fraction of the 'wavelength' the distance represents.
This is used for short distances (upto 10m) and high accuracy (mm) but is slow (5-10 seconds/reading) - it is used in the hand held DIY Disto measurers.
 
mgb_phys said:
There are two main ways of doing laser range finders.

...

Phase = transmit a continual visible beam varying in brightness sinusoidally at a few kHz. Measure the brightness of the returned beam and compare the phase difference.
From the phase you can tell what fraction of the 'wavelength' the distance represents.
This is used for short distances (upto 10m) and high accuracy (mm) but is slow (5-10 seconds/reading) - it is used in the hand held DIY Disto measurers.

I didn't think of varying the beams brightness...that's interesting...

Say I had a continuous beam shooting from d=0 to d=1m. During the continuous beam, I want to swipe something through the beam (break the beam) at a location of 10cm. Then do the same thing at 13cm, then 25cm, then 80cm, etc. etc. Would there be a way to record the location of the breaking of the beam? Would this be possible? Accurate?
 
  • #10
Astronuc said:
Laser range finders are popular in surveying and civil engineering.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_range-finder
http://www.opticsplanet.net/rangefinders1.html
http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~twd25/webcam_laser_ranger.html
http://www.acroname.com/robotics/info/articles/laser/laser.html
http://www.seattlerobotics.org/encoder/200110/vision.htm
http://www.asnt.org/publications/materialseval/solution/apr99solution/apr99sol.htm
http://www.ndt.net/article/v04n02/roberts3/roberts3.htm
http://www.solarius-inc.com/html/laser.html

In some industries, precision measurements are made with laser mircometers.

Thank you for the links...
The webcam laser range finder looks like a really cool project.

Thanks,
pud
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
dingpud said:
I didn't think of varying the beams brightness...that's interesting...
Remember you aren't measuring the brightness of the returned beam to calculate the distance from the loss of signal.
You are comparing the phase of the change in brightness - eg, if you receive a maximum at the same time your are transmitting a maximum, the object must be a whole number of 'wavelegnths' away - where this is the wavelength of the sine wave not light.
It has a problem that you need to integrate lots of waves to get a good answer so it is slow, and there is an ambiguity - the object could be 0.1, 10.1, 20.1 m away if the wavelength of the change is 10m. To solve this real instruments autaomatically make the measurements at a few different frequencies.

dingpud said:
Say I had a continuous beam shooting from d=0 to d=1m. During the continuous beam, I want to swipe something through the beam (break the beam) at a location of 10cm. Then do the same thing at 13cm, then 25cm, then 80cm, etc. etc. Would there be a way to record the location of the breaking of the beam? Would this be possible? Accurate?
Easily with a 'time of flight' system. These can make 10,000s of measurements/second and should give an accuracy of 1cm over that short range.
A typical system is used for counting traffic on a freeway - a single laser across 6 lanes can count vehicles breaking the beam and measure which lane they were in. Obviously you miss object which were completely hidden behind another object - unless you have another beam measuring from the other side.
 
  • #12
Right, comparing wavelengths, you aren't going to be able to differentiate between one amplitude vs. another, one crest vs the other, etc.

The traffic counting system is interesting. I'll have to Google that and see what comes up.

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K