Have You Uncovered Any Insane Integral Tricks in QFT Today?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tim_lou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights innovative techniques for calculating complex integrals in quantum field theory (QFT). A key method involves substituting a function with a gamma integral to simplify the expression, leading to a closed-form solution for integrals of the form ∫ d^d k / (k^2 + m^2)^n. Another integral trick discussed relates to the beta function, demonstrating how to interpret integrals as probabilities in a combinatorial context. Participants express curiosity about whether these tricks can be systematically discovered rather than through trial and error. The conversation emphasizes the value of sharing integral techniques to enhance collective understanding in QFT.
tim_lou
Messages
682
Reaction score
1
Ingenious integral tricks

In QFT today I learned some insane tricks in calculating impossible integrals...I figure it'd be a good idea to see if others have similar tricks so we can all learn from each other.

here goes:
to integrate (bounds are assumed to be from negative inf to inf, k^2 means the vector dot product)
edit: missing factors of 2pi

\int \frac{d^d k}{(2\pi)^d}\frac{1}{(k^2 + m^2)^n}
substitute
\frac{1}{(k^2 + m^2)^n}=\frac{1}{\Gamma(n)}\int_0^\infty t^n e^{-t(k^2 + m^2)} dt

and get a gaussian in the integral. At the end of the day,
\int \frac{d^d k}{(2\pi)^d}\frac{1}{(k^2 + m^2)^n}=\frac{\Gamma(n-d/2)(m^2)^{d/2-n}}{\Gamma(n)(4\pi)^{d/2}}

\Gamma(n)=(n-1)!

Quite crazy eh? I would've never thought of it myself... what about your favorite crazy tricks?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Another I have to share (I read it in some analysis book...)

take the following integral
\binom{m+n+1}{m,n}\int_0^1 u^{m} (1-u)^n du
consider the integral as a sum, we see that given m+n+1 particles on (0,1), it sums the probability of finding m particles in (0, u), 1 particle around the point u and n particles in (u, 1), so it must be one. This gives the beta integral for integers m, n!
\int_0^1 u^{m} (1-u)^n du=\frac{m!n!}{(m+n+1)!}
 


tim_lou said:
substitute
\frac{1}{(k^2 + m^2)^n}=\frac{1}{\Gamma(n)}\int_0^\infty t^n e^{-t(k^2 + m^2)} dt

I wonder if most of these crazy tricks can be found without guessing. This substitution suggests that the initial problem could be simply solved by Laplace transforms?!
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top