MHB Having a problem working through an equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter DeusAbscondus
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around difficulties in applying the product rule to find the second derivative of a complex equation. The original poster, DeusAbs, struggles with the equation and receives feedback confirming their calculations were incorrect, particularly in the differentiation process. Another participant clarifies the correct application of the product rule, leading to the correct answer, which is different from what was initially provided in the text. Ultimately, DeusAbs realizes their mistake and expresses gratitude for the assistance, highlighting their enthusiasm for learning despite challenges in mathematics. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correct differentiation techniques in calculus.
DeusAbscondus
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
I am finding product rule problems difficult.Trying to find the second derivative makes them explode into unweildly equations that are hard to deal with and factorize without making errors. Here is one I have got wrong; can someone spot where:

$72x^2(2x^4-1)^2+24x^3.2(2x^4-1)$
$=72x^2(2x^4-1)2+48x^3(2x^4-1)$
$=24x^2(2x^4-1)[3(2x^4-1)+2]$
$=24x^2(2x^4-1)(6x^4-1)$

$\text{But answer given in my text is: }$
$24x^2(2x^4-1)(22x^4-3)$

Can anyone help see the point where I went astray?
thanks kindly,
DeusAbs
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
DeusAbscondus said:
I am finding product rule problems difficult.Trying to find the second derivative makes them explode into unweildly equations that are hard to deal with and factorize without making errors. Here is one I have got wrong; can someone spot where:

$72x^2(2x^4-1)^2+24x^3.2(2x^4-1)$
$=72x^2(2x^4-1)^2+48x^3(2x^4-1)$ SS4: Is that two a typo, I'm guessing it should be to the power 2[/color]
$=24x^2(2x^4-1)[3(2x^4-1)+2]$
$=24x^2(2x^4-1)(6x^4-1)$

$\text{But answer given in my text is: }$
$24x^2(2x^4-1)(22x^4-3)$

Can anyone help see the point where I went astray?
thanks kindly,
DeusAbs

I get the same answer as you. Did you take the derivative correctly? If you want post the function you need to take the second derivative of with any working you've done.
 
SuperSonic4 said:
I get the same answer as you. Did you take the derivative correctly? If you want post the function you need to take the second derivative of with any working you've done.

Hey, you are really nice man! Thanks for speedy response: i actually got it!
Still, nice to have confirmed that i was on the right track.D'Abs

(PS you can be sure you'll never run out of questions from me: keen as mustard and not greatly skilled: I am no natural at this, but i LOVE it!)
 
Hello, DeusAbscondus!

\text{Differentiate }\:h(x) \:=\: 24x^3(2x^4-1)^2

h'(x) \;=\;72x^2(2x^4-1)^2+24x^3\cdot2(2x^4-1) . Here!

\text{Answer: }\:24x^2(2x^4-1)(22x^4-3)
\text{We have: }\:h(x) \;=\;\overbrace{24x^3}^{f(x)}\cdot\overbrace{(2x^4-1)^2}^{g(x)}

\text{Product Rule: }\;h'(x) \;=\;\overbrace{72x^2}^{f'(x)}\cdot\overbrace{(2x^4-1)^2}^{g(x)} + \overbrace{24x^3}^{f(x)}\cdot \overbrace{2(2x^4-1)\color{red}{(8x^3)}}^{g'(x)}

. . . . . . h'(x) \;=\;72x^2(2x^4-1)^2 + 384x^6(2x^4-1)

\text{Factor: }\;h'(x) \;=\;24x^2(2x^4-1)\cdot\left(3[2x^4-1] + 16x^4\right)

. . . . . . h'(x) \;=\;24x^2(2x^4-1)\,(6x^4-3 + 16x^4)

. . . . . . h'(x) \;=\;24x^2(2x^4-1)(22x^4-3)LaTeX isn't dependable?
 
soroban said:
Hello, DeusAbscondus!


\text{We have: }\:h(x) \;=\;\overbrace{24x^3}^{f(x)}\cdot\overbrace{(2x^4-1)^2}^{g(x)}

\text{Product Rule: }\;h'(x) \;=\;\overbrace{72x^2}^{f'(x)}\cdot\overbrace{(2x^4-1)^2}^{g(x)} + \overbrace{24x^3}^{f(x)}\cdot \overbrace{2(2x^4-1)\color{red}{(8x^3)}}^{g'(x)}

. . . . . . h'(x) \;=\;72x^2(2x^4-1)^2 + 384x^6(2x^4-1)

\text{Factor: }\;h'(x) \;=\;24x^2(2x^4-1)\cdot\left(3[2x^4-1] + 16x^4\right)

. . . . . . h'(x) \;=\;24x^2(2x^4-1)\,(6x^4-3 + 16x^4)

. . . . . . h'(x) \;=\;24x^2(2x^4-1)(22x^4-3)LaTeX isn't dependable?

soroban, I don't know how you managed to reconstitute the problem, but you got it...!
And so did I, not 30 mins after making initial post.
You were correct of course: (as was SuperSonic4) I hadn't derived the second properly.

I've been floating on a cushion of relief and feel my self-confidence seeping back deep into my maths bones.
Thanks heaps for input!
D'abs
PS the significance of your cryptic comment re. Latex intrigues while it escapes me... please explain some time?
 
Last edited:
DeusAbscondus said:
(PS you can be sure you'll never run out of questions from me: keen as mustard and not greatly skilled: I am no natural at this, but i LOVE it!)

Well, MHB is all about people like you, so anything you think could improve MHB would be welcome to hear. Please post such things in the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f25/ forum, and keep asking math questions!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top