Having trouble with Hydrostatics problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Theelectricchild
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydrostatics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum mass of lead required to make a piece of wood sink in water. The wood has a mass of 3.15 kg and a specific gravity of 0.5, indicating it has half the density of water. Participants analyze the buoyant force and the equilibrium condition, concluding that the average density of the wood and lead combined must equal the density of water for sinking to occur. Various methods are proposed, with one participant arriving at a lead mass of approximately 3.46 kg, while another suggests 2.00 kg using a different approach. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accounting for the buoyant force acting on both the wood and the lead in the calculations.
Theelectricchild
Messages
260
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone!

The problem statement reads: A 3.15kg piece of wood (Spec. Grav. = 0.5) floats on water. What is the minimum mass of lead, hung from it by a string will cause it to sink?

Heres my reasoning. Since the log is floating, I know that it is in equilibrium, and therefore the Bouyant force Fb = force due to gravity. Thus Fb = 3.15kg *9.8m/s^2.

But I also know that an object will float on water if \rho_w > \rho_o

I know the specific gravity as 0.5 so I know that the density of the wood is one half that of the water! So I've concluded that I must add enough lead to make the density of wood + density of added lead = density of water to get a minimum to sink. My only problem is, if density is m/V, how would i know what V to use?

Ok so let me think this--- I know mass of wood, and I know the denisty of it is 1/2 of water. So set 1/2 water density = m/V where m is the mass of the wood. Then solve for V and ill know the woods volume. But i Have no idea where to go from here! Sure i can look up density of lead in the book, but i don't know how much MASS to add! Would anyone happen to know how to approach this? THANKS!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok here's a little more thought into it--- Lead is a defined material that will always have the same density no matter how small a chunk or large a chunk you have. So BY itself even the tinniest piece of lead will sink, But interestingly when you add that piece to the wood there will be an amt that the wood will still float.
 
Theelectricchild said:
So I've concluded that I must add enough lead to make the density of wood + density of added lead = density of water to get a minimum to sink.
This is a perfectly good way to approach this problem: Set the average density equal to that of water:
\frac{m_{wood} + m_{lead}}{V_{wood} + V_{lead}} = \rho_{water}
Since you know that \rho = m/V, you can rewrite this equation in terms of masses and densities only and solve for the only unknown, the mass of the lead.
 
THank you doc al, using that information here's what I did:

Since we know the mass as 3.15kg, and we know SG = 0.5, then we know m/V = 500 kg/m^3 (half density of water) and thus can solve for Volume of wood = 0.0063 m^3.

Since the woods floating, we have a statics problem with Fnet = 0. Thus we need to add a mass of lead that increases the net density of wood + lead = to that of water to get a MIN for the wood/lead combo to sink.

Therefore I set the avg density of water ill denote with p as:

p(water) = [m(wood) + m(lead)] / [(V(wood) + V(lead)]

Since we know p = m/V, I attempted rewriting this equation in terms of the masses and densities only and solve for the only unknown, the mass of the lead:

So thus 1000 = (3.15kg + mlead) / (0.0063 m^3 + Vlead)

Although this eqn has 2 unknowns, we still know the common ratio of mlead/Vlead = density of lead = 11.3E3 kg/m^3

Thus... Multiplying both sides by (0.0063 +Vlead) we have

3.15kg + mlead = 6.3 +1000Vlead

then: 3.15kg + 1000Vlead = mlead

Divide both sides by V and get

3.15/Vlead + 1000 = 11.3E3

Solve for V lead then sub back into mlead/Vlead = 11.3E3 and get that mlead = 3.4558 kg


But then...

I looked at it a little differently instead and thought to increase the total mass of the (wood + lead) to equal the mass of the displaced water,
thus the buoyant force will be canceled at this point (and a little more mass will make it sink...)

since we know the volume of the wood, we know when it is totally submerged the displaced water volume will be the same, and we can then determine the buoyant force of the water = mg = (volume displaced water * water density)g = (mass of wood + mass of lead)*g
thus
(volume displaced water * water density) = (mass of wood + mass of lead)

and so I got Mlead = 2.00 kg (using sea water density 1.025 x 10^3...)

Would this method be wrong? Is this first answer of 3.45kg the more accurate one then? thanks
 
Well this is my last bump for the thread, I would reaaaaly appreciate anyone checking the validity of my method. Thank you :smile:
 
the buoyant force also acts upon the lead. so you must take it into account. it will lead back to what Doc Al has given you.
The total weight of lead and wood = The buoyant force acts on them
g(m_{lead}+m_{wood})=V_{lead}\rho_{water}g+V_{wood}\rho_{water}g
\rho_{water}=\frac{m_{lead}+m_{wood}}{V_{lead}+V_{wood}}
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top