Having trouble with Rocket concepts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Demon117
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concepts Rocket
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of modeling single-stage rockets with non-constant fuel burn rates. The original equation of motion is modified to incorporate the variable fuel burn rate, R(ṁ), leading to the revised equation m₀(dv/dt) = -V R(ṁ). Participants emphasize that as fuel is burned, both the rocket's velocity and mass change, complicating the analysis. It is suggested that the problem may stem from misrepresenting the fuel burn dynamics, as a constant burn rate could simplify the situation. The conversation highlights the need for careful consideration of mass changes when calculating rocket motion.
Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
Hello, I am trying to investigate single-stage rockets and I've come across a particular situation I don't know how to handle. The situation I have is that the rocket in question is burning it's fuel not at a constant rate but at a rate R(\dot{m}). So to find the equations of motion shouldn't be much different than for that of a constant rate. Assuming no external forces I should have:

\frac{dp}{dt}=m_{o}\frac{dv}{dt} + V\frac{dm}{dt} = 0

Here, V is given by V=v-v_{ex}, where v_{ex} is the velocity of the particulates with respect to the motion of the rocket. But where does R(\dot{m}) enter into the picture? Or am I missing something here? Any good references for this type of question? Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember m-dot = dm/dt, so R(m-dot) must be worked into the second term.
 
SteamKing said:
Remember m-dot = dm/dt, so R(m-dot) must be worked into the second term.

It would seem that I have misrepresented the equation of motion in light of that. Modifying it would give me something more like

m_{0}\frac{dv}{dt}+V R(\dot{m})=0
m_{0}\frac{dv}{dt} = -V R(\dot{m})

From here how would you find v(t), this problem doesn't seem solvable analytically.
 
Are you sure you're burning your fuel at a non-constant rate?

I think the true situation is that the mass of your rocket is changing as you burn fuel at a constant rate.

The momentum of the fuel coming out the back is equal to the change in momentum of your rocket. Except, since you're burning fuel, not only is the velocity of the rocket changing; but its mass is changing too. By looking at the energy it took to move from the launch pad to some altitude, you can calculate how much fuel you burned and how that affected the rocket's mass.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top