Having trouble with time (in)dependant solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChaosCon343
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
ChaosCon343
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey all -

I'm taking my first quantum class this year, and I'm still on really shaky ground about time-dependent and time-independent solutions of the Schrödinger equation. I understand that the time independent Schrödinger equation comes from separating your space and time variables, but I have trouble interpreting the meanings of both types of solutions. Particularly, why can you reconstruct any arbitrary \Psi(x,t) out of the time-independent solutions? Rather, why can an electron in, say, an infinite square well potential have different \Psi's?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solve the time-dependent Schroedinger equation i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\Psi(x,t) = H\Psi(x,t) by separation of variables to give the following particular solutions (which have the counterintuitive property of predicting time-independent observables):

<br /> \Psi(x,t) = \phi_E(x)e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}Et}\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;|\Psi(x,t)|^2 = |\phi_E(x)|^2<br />

Where has the time gone? It is restored to us by a general solution to the TDSE - an arbitrary superposition of the particular solutions:

<br /> \Psi(x,t) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n\phi_n(x) e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}E_nt} \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\text{\mathrm{(discrete\;spectrum)}}<br />

<br /> \Psi(x,t) = \int_0^{\infty} a(E)\phi_E(x) e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}Et}\;dE \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\text{\mathrm{(continuous \; spectrum)}}<br />

Quite generally, a wave packet - a superposition of states having different energies - is required in order to have a time-dependence in the probability density and in other observable quantities, such as the average position or momentum of a particle.
Simplest example: a linear combination of just two particular solutions

\Psi(x,t) = a\phi_E(x) e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}Et} + b\phi_{E&#039;}(x) e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}E&#039;t}.

The probability density is given by:

<br /> |\Psi(x,t)|^2 = |a|^2|\phi_E(x)|^2 + |b|^2|\Psi_{E&#039;}(x)|^2 + 2\mathrm{Re}\left\{a^*b\phi_E^*(x)\phi_{E&#039;}(x)\mathrm{e}^{-i\frac{(E&#039;-E)t}{\hbar}}\right\}<br />

All the time-dependence is contained in the interference term.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top