Hawking Radiation: Observational Proof, Quantum Fluctuations & More

spidey
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
1. Do we have observational proof for hawking radiation? Or is it verified only theoritically?
2. why is that only negative energy photon goes into black hole and positive energy photon is going out from black hole? what if the reverse happens? do we have an observatinal proof for this?
3. can someone tell me about quantum fluctuations in simple terms?
4. why the quantum fluctuations happening only near event horizon? do we have any proof for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
spidey said:
1. Do we have observational proof for hawking radiation? Or is it verified only theoritically?
I don't believe that Hawking Radiation has yet been observed.
2. why is that only negative energy photon goes into black hole and positive energy photon is going out from black hole? what if the reverse happens? do we have an observatinal proof for this?
3. can someone tell me about quantum fluctuations in simple terms?
Take a look here for an answer to these to questions.
4. why the quantum fluctuations happening only near event horizon? do we have any proof for this?
By vacuum fluctuations, I think you mean pair production from the vacuum; this does not just happen near the event horizon of a black hole, but everywhere. However, as that article above says, these virtual pairs annihilate each other shortly after they are produced anywhere else in space. It is only near an event horizon that we get Hawking radiation, since one of the particles falls into the event horizon, and so cannot annihilate with its partner.
 
spidey said:
1. Do we have observational proof for hawking radiation? Or is it verified only theoritically?
There is no direct observational evidence concerning Hawking radiation, but there is some indirect evidence concerning the (directly related) circular Unruh radiation, which has been considered explaining why ultra-relativistic electrons in storage rings do not reach 100% polarization.
 
Thank you for clearing my doubts...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top