Head-on Collision Damage: Comparing 50mph and 100mph Impact Damage

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brian LB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Damage
AI Thread Summary
In a head-on collision between two cars traveling at 50mph, the damage sustained would resemble that of each car hitting a brick wall at 50mph rather than 100mph. The impact force is shared equally, leading to a collapse of 50cm per car, similar to the damage from a single car hitting a wall at the same speed. Although force increases with the square of velocity, in this scenario, the effects balance out due to the equal speeds and shared impact. Thus, each car experiences damage equivalent to a 50mph impact, regardless of the other vehicle's presence. This illustrates the unique dynamics of head-on collisions compared to stationary barriers.
Brian LB
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
If two cars of equal size were each traveling 50mph and hit each other in a head-on collision would the damage sustained best resemble hitting a brick wall at 50mph or 100mph? Assume the full impact of the head-on collision was into each car and not vectoring away from the impact zone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Brian LB said:
If two cars of equal size were each traveling 50mph and hit each other in a head-on collision would the damage sustained best resemble hitting a brick wall at 50mph or 100mph? Assume the full impact of the head-on collision was into each car and not vectoring away from the impact zone.

Each car would appear as if it hit something at 50mph.

Look at a super idealized case: Every 10mph causes the front-end to collapse by 10cm.
At 50mph into a brick wall, the front-end collapses 50cm.
At 100mph into a brick wall, the front-end collapses 100cm.
But at 100mph into another car, the 100cm collapse is shared between them: 50cm per car, just as much as if each car slammed into a brick wall at 50mph.

This is super-idealized because force is a product of velocity squared, so double the speed is quadruple the damage. However, that cancels out in the above scenario.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top