Head-on Collision Damage: Comparing 50mph and 100mph Impact Damage

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brian LB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Damage
AI Thread Summary
In a head-on collision between two cars traveling at 50mph, the damage sustained would resemble that of each car hitting a brick wall at 50mph rather than 100mph. The impact force is shared equally, leading to a collapse of 50cm per car, similar to the damage from a single car hitting a wall at the same speed. Although force increases with the square of velocity, in this scenario, the effects balance out due to the equal speeds and shared impact. Thus, each car experiences damage equivalent to a 50mph impact, regardless of the other vehicle's presence. This illustrates the unique dynamics of head-on collisions compared to stationary barriers.
Brian LB
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
If two cars of equal size were each traveling 50mph and hit each other in a head-on collision would the damage sustained best resemble hitting a brick wall at 50mph or 100mph? Assume the full impact of the head-on collision was into each car and not vectoring away from the impact zone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Brian LB said:
If two cars of equal size were each traveling 50mph and hit each other in a head-on collision would the damage sustained best resemble hitting a brick wall at 50mph or 100mph? Assume the full impact of the head-on collision was into each car and not vectoring away from the impact zone.

Each car would appear as if it hit something at 50mph.

Look at a super idealized case: Every 10mph causes the front-end to collapse by 10cm.
At 50mph into a brick wall, the front-end collapses 50cm.
At 100mph into a brick wall, the front-end collapses 100cm.
But at 100mph into another car, the 100cm collapse is shared between them: 50cm per car, just as much as if each car slammed into a brick wall at 50mph.

This is super-idealized because force is a product of velocity squared, so double the speed is quadruple the damage. However, that cancels out in the above scenario.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top