Heads or tails? (Question from Feynman lectures)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the probability of getting heads in coin tosses using the formula (n choose k) = n! / (k!(n-k)!). The confusion arises regarding the placement of factorials in the equation, specifically why k! and (n-k)! are in the denominator rather than n! in the denominator and k! in the numerator. The explanation highlights that the formula calculates the number of ways to achieve k heads from n tosses. An example with n = 5 is suggested to illustrate how the formula applies. The lectures referenced were actually given by Matt Sands, not Feynman himself.
#neutrino
Messages
51
Reaction score
2
I have been going through feynmans lectures on probability and have a few questions that i can't answer ; in the part regarding fluctuations he introduces us to tree diagrams(pascals triangle ) and gives an example regarding the toss of a coin
If we consider the no. Of tosses as n and no. Of heads as k then it can be given as
( n) n!
( k ) = ----
k!(n-k)!
I know that n! Represents n factorial and the fact that probability is generally
Given by
Probability = highest estimate of an event
----------------------------
Total no. Of events
However what i don't get is why do we multiply k! By (n-k)! Souldnt it be n! In the denominator and k! In the numerator ?
I know it has something to do with the triangle however unable to figure it out
 
Physics news on Phys.org
#neutrino said:
I have been going through feynmans lectures on probability and have a few questions that i can't answer ; in the part regarding fluctuations he introduces us to tree diagrams(pascals triangle ) and gives an example regarding the toss of a coin
If we consider the no. Of tosses as n and no. Of heads as k then it can be given as
( n) n!
( k ) = ----
k!(n-k)!
I know that n! Represents n factorial and the fact that probability is generally
Given by
Probability = highest estimate of an event
----------------------------
Total no. Of events
However what i don't get is why do we multiply k! By (n-k)! Souldnt it be n! In the denominator and k! In the numerator ?
I know it has something to do with the triangle however unable to figure it out
The equation is (n)= n!
(k) -----
k!(
 
The equation is (n)= n!
-----
k!(n-k)!
 
You're actually asking, I think, about how many ways you can get ##k## heads from ##n## coin tosses. And why the answer is ##\frac{n!}{(n-k)! k!}##

You could start by taking ##n = 5##, say, and counting all the ways you can get ##k = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4## and ##5##.

Then see whether that fits the formula, and why.
 
BTW (just in case anyone is interested), this was not Feynman's lecture, but Matt Sands' lecture. Feynman had to go out of town on some business for a week, so Matt Sands gave the lectures that became FLP Vol. I Chapters 5 and 6.
 
  • Like
Likes Vivek des
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top