Heat capacity and its relation with internal energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between heat capacity at constant volume (Cv) and internal energy (U) in thermodynamics. It clarifies that Cv is defined as Cv = (∂U/∂T)V, emphasizing that internal energy is a function of temperature, particularly for ideal gases. The conversation highlights the importance of distinguishing between δQ and dQ, with δQ representing heat transfer and dQ being a non-existent state variable. The derivation of Cv from the first law of thermodynamics is also discussed, reinforcing the concept that at constant volume, dU = CvdT.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the first law of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with state variables and their properties
  • Knowledge of heat capacity definitions (Cv and Cp)
  • Basic concepts of entropy and its relation to thermodynamic processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the first law of thermodynamics in detail
  • Explore the concept of entropy and its implications in thermodynamic systems
  • Learn about the differences between heat capacities Cv and Cp in various thermodynamic processes
  • Investigate the behavior of internal energy for non-ideal gases
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those focusing on thermodynamics, heat transfer, and energy systems.

cooper607
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
hi everyone,
in thermodynamics, when we calculate the heat capacity in constant volume, we assume Cv=dQ/dT..

well, but at isothermal condition suddenly they came up with Cv=dU/dT...
so i am getting stuck with this concept how they replace dQ with dU?

i know U= internal energy is only a function of T, but what is the explanation behind it? please help with the derivation and clarification...

advanced regards.
 
Science news on Phys.org
You have to be careful with that "dQ" - there is no such thing as "Q" so there is no such thing as "dQ". Usually it is written "\delta Q", which is an abbreviation for "T dS" to emphasize this fact. You only use the "d" in front of state variables, and there is no "Q" state variable. A state variable X obeys \oint dX=0. In other words the integral around a closed path of a state variable is zero, and the integral between two points is not dependent on the path. \oint \delta Q is really \oint T dS and that's not necessarily zero.

The correct way to define the C's are TdS=C_V dT at constant volume and TdS=C_P dT at constant pressure.

You can write the fundamental equation (at constant number of particles) as dU=TdS-PdV and since, by the chain rule, dU=\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_V dT + \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial V}\right)_T dV you can see that at constant volume, TdS= \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_V dT so that C_V=\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_V

You can also write the fundamental equation (at constant number of particles) as dH=TdS+VdP where H is the enthalpy (H=U+PV) and since, by the chain rule, dH=\left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial T}\right)_P dT + \left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial P}\right)_T dP you can see that at constant pressure, TdS= \left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial T}\right)_P dT so that C_P=\left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial T}\right)_P
 
i know U= internal energy is only a function of T, but what is the explanation behind it? please help with the derivation and clarification...

I think you are mixing up several things you have been told.
Don't worry this is not uncommon there is a lot to get hold of in thermodynamics.

So firstly your statement about U is only true for ideal gasses. It is one of the possible definitions of an ideal gas and was proved experimentally by Joule. However it is not relevant here.


{\left( {\frac{{\partial U}}{{\partial V}}} \right)_T} = 0

As regards your query about Cv,

It is not necessary to invoke entropy and considering your definition of Cv you may not have met entropy anyway.

Since your version of the first law probably reads something like

dU = δQ - pdV and your definition of Cv is


{C_v} = {\left( {\frac{{\delta Q}}{{\partial T}}} \right)_V}

(RAP is correct it is not a good idea to use dQ)

So δQ = CvdT

Substituting into the first law

dU = CvdT - pdV

But at constant volume dV = 0

dU = CvdT

rearranging


{C_v} = {\left( {\frac{{dU}}{{dT}}} \right)_V}
 
oh now i got it... i was mixing up the things really.. thanks for the great help and explanation rap and studiot...

regards
 
oh now i got it... i was mixing up the things really.. thanks for the great help and explanation rap and studiot...

regards
 
Glad you got it sorted

:wink:
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
683
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
18K