Heat to current conversion efficiency

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the efficiency of heat-to-electricity conversion in traditional thermoelectric power plants compared to a new device utilizing cermet materials. Standard thermoelectric power plants achieve a maximum conversion efficiency of about 50-60% when using combined cycle systems. The new cermet technology, specifically a four-layer silica-tungsten cermet selective solar absorber, demonstrates thermal transfer efficiencies of 84.3% at 400 K and 75.59% at 1000 K. Additionally, this technology could enable thermophotovoltaic systems to reach overall energy conversion efficiencies of 10.66% at 1000 K. The discussion highlights the potential of cermet materials to improve energy conversion efficiency significantly.
jumpjack
Messages
223
Reaction score
3
Does anybody have any numbers for this new discovery?
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2011/sun-free-photovoltaics-0728.html

How much of the heat is converted into electricity by a standard thermoelectric power plant?
And how much of the heat is converted into electricity by this new device?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Abstract
Solar thermal, thermoelectric, and thermophotovoltaic (TPV) systems have high maximum theoretical efficiencies; experimental systems fall short because of losses by selective solar absorbers and TPV selective emitters. To improve these critical components, we study a class of materials known as cermets. While our approach is completely general, the most promising cermet candidate combines nanoparticles of silica and tungsten. We find that 4-layer silica-tungsten cermet selective solar absorbers can achieve thermal transfer efficiencies of 84.3% at 400 K, and 75.59% at 1000 K, exceeding comparable literature values. Three layer silica-tungsten cermets can also be used as selective emitters for InGaAsSb-based thermophotovoltaic systems, with projected overall system energy conversion efficiencies of 10.66% at 1000 K using realistic design parameters. The marginal benefit of adding more than 4 cermet layers is small (less than 0.26%, relative).

David Chester, Peter Bermel, John D. Joannopoulos, Marin Soljacic, and Ivan Celanovic, "Design and global optimization of high-efficiency solar thermal systems with tungsten cermets," Opt. Express 19, A245-A257 (2011)
 
Thanks for the "new"; what aboud the "old"? Which is the efficiency of turning heat into steam into rotation into electricity?
 
not sure, you may have more luck with that question in mechanical/electrical engineering forums. I don't like numbers :P
 
jumpjack said:
Thanks for the "new"; what aboud the "old"? Which is the efficiency of turning heat into steam into rotation into electricity?

I believe the conversion of heat to electricity via a heat engine is about 50%-60% at max using combined cycle plants.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top