Heating Resistors: Current & Voltage for Temp Control

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of resistors when heated, specifically focusing on the relationship between temperature, resistance, current, and voltage. Participants explore how to calculate the necessary electrical parameters to achieve a desired temperature in resistors, considering various types of resistors and their thermal characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that heating a resistor will lead to a specific temperature being maintained due to a decrease in resistance with increased temperature.
  • Another participant counters that most resistor materials have a positive temperature coefficient, meaning their resistance increases with temperature, challenging the initial claim.
  • A participant mentions that carbon-based resistors can have a negative temperature coefficient of resistance, providing a specific value of -500ppm/°C.
  • Further elaboration indicates that negative temperature coefficients can lead to runaway thermal currents, where increased heat results in lower resistance, causing more current to flow and generating even more heat.
  • Participants discuss the complexity of calculating temperature rise in resistors, noting that thermal resistance values from datasheets can assist but are not straightforward due to multiple heat dissipation paths.
  • A formula for estimating temperature based on power dissipation and thermal resistance is provided, but it is emphasized that this is an estimate and not intended for precise temperature control.
  • Feedback mechanisms using temperature sensors for controlling heating elements are mentioned as a more common approach for temperature regulation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the behavior of resistors with temperature changes, with some asserting that resistance decreases while others argue that it typically increases. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the topic.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependency on specific resistor materials and their characteristics, as well as the complexity of heat dissipation mechanisms that can affect temperature calculations.

Passionate Eng
Messages
36
Reaction score
1
if I heat a resistor, it will reach a specific temperature and keep it.
because as temperature increases the resistance decreases, so reducing the power absorbed.
is that true?
and how to calculate how much current and voltage I have to deliver to reach a specific temperature?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Passionate Eng said:
if I heat a resistor, it will reach a specific temperature and keep it.
because as temperature increases the resistance decreases, so reducing the power absorbed.
is that true?
No, most resistor materials have a positive temperature coefficient, so their resistance goes up with increased temperature.
Passionate Eng said:
and how to calculate how much current and voltage I have to deliver to reach a specific temperature?
If you look on the resistor's datasheet, it may have some information on the thermal resistance in degrees C per Watt. Beyond that, it can be pretty hard to calculate the temperature rise in free air at a given power dissipation...
 
A resistor with a Carbon based element has a negative temperature coefficient of resistance; around -500ppm/oC. (-0.05%/oC)
 
Tom.G said:
A resistor with a Carbon based element has a negative temperature coefficient of resistance; around -500ppm/oC. (-0.05%/oC)
Interesting. I don't typically use carbon resistors for any precision circuits, so I missed that.

Here is a good link with resistor Tempcos:

http://www.resistorguide.com/temperature-coefficient-of-resistance/
Resistors are available with a TCR tht is negative, positive, or stable over a certain temperature range.
 
Passionate Eng said:
because as temperature increases the resistance decreases, so reducing the power absorbed.
is that true?

In general no. Let's assume you have a resistor with a negative temperature coefficient so that your premise is true. Let's also make it a 10 Ohm resistor being fed by a 10V source. The current will be 1 Amp so it will be using 10 Watts of power. If the resistance fell by half because the resistor became hot then the current would be 2 Amps and the power would become: (2Amps)^2*5Ohm = 20 Watts.

Negative temperature coefficients can cause runaway thermal currents. As some devices get warmer their electrical resistance gets lower and it allows more current to flow which creates more heat etc. It's an engineering problem.

Manufacturers will sometimes give you a thermal resistance in a spec sheet for a given part. You can plug that and the ambient temperature into a formula to estimate how hot the device will become for a given load. It gets complicated though. The device could have multiple paths to dissipate heat. There could be a thermal resistance for the device package to ambient air, thermal resistance to the printed circuit board, and thermal resistance from the circuit board to ambient air. All of those figures depend on how the designer implements the device.

Anyway, the formula is straightforward.

$$ Temp = P_{dissipated}θ_{ThermalResistance} + T_{ambient}$$

Remember that this is just an estimate. It's used to ensure that you are not overheating components in a design. It's not intended for temperature control.

When you do want some kind of temperature control it's more common to use feedback. A temperature sensor could send a signal to increase power to a heating element when the temperature is lower than you want.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
Replies
68
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
30
Views
3K