Heaviside function and dirac delta

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the derivative of the Heaviside function, H'(t), equals the Dirac delta function, δ(t). Participants are examining the properties of the Heaviside function and its relationship with smooth functions that vanish at infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of integrating the derivative of the product of the Heaviside function and a smooth function. Questions arise regarding the steps in the proof, particularly the transition between various equations and the definitions involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made progress in understanding the integration by parts approach, while others express confusion about specific steps and definitions, particularly concerning the Dirac delta function. There is an acknowledgment of the need for a clearer understanding of the definitions used in the context of distributions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the discontinuity of the Heaviside function and question the appropriateness of the derivative definitions being applied. There is also mention of the limitations in the understanding of the Dirac delta function among some participants, which affects their ability to complete the proof.

KateyLou
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi there, i am trying to do a proof that H'(t)= δ(t)

Homework Equations



We have been given the following:

F is a smooth function such that lim (t-->±∞)F(t)=0
Therefore the integral between ±∞ of [H(t)F(t)]'=[H(t)F(t)]-∞=0

I understand it up until this point; however next it says:
"Integration by parts:
(1) = Integral between ±∞ of [H(f)'F(t)]dt
(2) = -the integral between ±∞ of H(t)F'(t)dt
(3) = -the integral between ∞ and 0 of F'(t)dt
(4) = [-F(t)]0
(5) = F(0)
(6) = Integral between ±∞ of δ(t)F(t)dt

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know where they have got theequation from in (1) or (2) or (3)! I get 4 though and 5! Although i don't then get 6!

I think if i knew where (1) came from i maybe could get through the rest but i just don't know where it has come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KateyLou said:

Homework Statement



Hi there, i am trying to do a proof that H'(t)= δ(t)

Homework Equations



We have been given the following:

F is a smooth function such that lim (t-->±∞)F(t)=0
Therefore the integral between ±∞ of [H(t)F(t)]'=[H(t)F(t)]-∞=0

Do you understand that this says \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \left(\frac{d}{dt}(H(t)F(t))\right)dt=0?

Since this is true for all functions F(t) such that lim (t-->±∞)F(t)=0, what must then be true of \frac{d}{dt}(H(t)F(t))?

Equation (1) follows from using that along with the product rule :\frac{d}{dt}(H(t)F(t))=H'(t)F(t)+H(t)F'(t)
 
Yes i think I get the =0 part (by the way how do you write equations like that?)
And thank you re: the product rule - not sure how i managed to miss that! will go back to it and see how far i get this time!
 
Right i have now completed this up to the last stage - i do not understand how it has gone from F(0) to \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \left(\delta (t)F(t)\right)dt
 
And that is what defines the delta "function" (I have put "function" in quotes because it is not, of course, a "function", it is a "distribution" or "generalized function").
 
What definition are you using for the derivative here? Note that the heaviside function is discontinuous, so it isn't differentiable using the derivative you used in Calc I. (similarly, H(x)F(x) is not differentiable)

The generalizations I know of the derivative take (1) = (2) to be the definition. (With the requirement that F be a sufficiently good function; here we need at least differentiable and vanishing at infinity)

As for the last question, what do you know about the Dirac delta distribution? Even if you know only one thing about it, it's probably the thing you need to use...
 
i don't know what definition i am using... I have taken that straight from the maths notes we were given... (sorry!)

What do i know about the dirac delta function...well, the intergral of it is one, and that happens at t=0?
 
KateyLou said:
What do i know about the dirac delta function...well, the intergral of it is one, and that happens at t=0?
D'oh, you got me. :frown: If that's the only thing you've been taught about the dirac delta distribution, then you are incapable of finishing this problem. (And so shame on your teacher for assigning it!) The step you are stuck upon is often used as the definition of the dirac delta.
 
ha! ok!
So what is this definition then? I think i shall go an google it...
 
  • #10
kateylou said:
ha! Ok!
So what is this definition then? I think i shall go an google it...

(5) = (6)
 
  • #11
oh! lol!
Thank you guys :-)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K