Heaviside function and Unit impulse (delta) help

metiscus
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can someone give me quick refresher on what happens when you multiply the heaviside function with the unit impulse?

Typically, the unit step function multiplied by anything simply delays it by the offset in the unit step function. The unit impulse function makes the value defined at only one point. At least I believe this is so... for example:
(n+1)U(n)*d(n-2) = (n-1)u(n-2) right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This may be somewhat late, but your final equation does not technically make sense, though I believe you are on the correct track. The Dirac delta function is not a function at all, but rather a distribution, and thus only makes sense as an operator on a functional space. Consequently, you can only evaluate it when you have it as part of an inner-product.

Furthermore, it does not simply make the substitution n \to n-2. It evaluates the function at the root of the argument, so that
\begin{align*} \int_{-\infty}^\infty (x+1)U(x)\delta(x-2) dx &amp;= \left. (x+1)U(x) \right|_{x=2}\\<br /> &amp;= 3 \end{align*}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top