Height of Milk in a Carton with Two Pierced Holes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the height of milk in a carton with two holes, using equations of motion and Torricelli's Theorem. The derived formula for the height of the milk, h, is expressed as h = y_i + y_s, where y_s and y_i are the heights of the superior and inferior holes, respectively. Participants confirm the algebra is correct and express interest in the simplicity of the result. They also consider the implications of varying the heights of the holes and whether the result seems reasonable under different conditions. The conclusion suggests that experimental verification could further validate the findings.
TeTeC
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone.

'A carton of milk is placed on a table. It has 2 holes pierced through a vertical side. At one point in time, the 2 jets of milk flowing out are reaching the table a the same point. Determine the height of milk in the carton as a function of the respective heights y_{{s}} and y_{{i}} of the superior and inferior holes.'

Here is my work:

The equations of motion first, used in this situation:
x=v_{{x_{{s}}}}t_{{s}} (1)
x=v_{{x_{{i}}}}t_{{i}} (2)
0=1/2\,g{t_{{s}}}^{2}+y_{{s}} (3)
0=1/2\,g{t_{{i}}}^{2}+y_{{i}} (4)

Where h is the height of milk in the carton, assuming that Torricelli's Theorem can be used here, I have in equations (1) and (2):

x=\sqrt {2g \left( h-y_{{s}} \right) }t_{{s}} (5)
x=\sqrt {2g \left( h-y_{{i}} \right) }t_{{i}} (6)

Then, when replacing (5) and (6) in equations (3) and (4):

0=1/4\,{\frac {{x}^{2}}{h-y_{{s}}}}+y_{{s}} (7)
0=1/4\,{\frac {{x}^{2}}{h-y_{{i}}}}+y_{{i}} (8)

Using equation (8), I find:

{x}^{2}=-4\,y_{{i}} \left( h-y_{{i}} \right)

Then I replace in equation (7) and follows a few lines of development:

-{\frac {y_{{i}} \left( h-y_{{i}} \right) }{h-y_{{s}}}}+y_{{s}}
-y_{{s}}h+{y_{{s}}}^{2}=-y_{{i}}h+{y_{{i}}}^{2}
-y_{{s}}h+y_{{i}}h={y_{{i}}}^{2}-{y_{{s}}}^{2}
h={\frac {{y_{{i}}}^{2}-{y_{{s}}}^{2}}{y_{{i}}-y_{{s}}}}
h=y_{{i}}+y_{{s}}

Actually, I don't have obvious problems with this exercice, I just find the result quite amazing, for this is really a simple answer... Maybe I'm just unable to deal with such easy answers. :rolleyes:

The question is : Is this seems to be right?

Thanks a lot!

P.S: the wording is translated from French... Excuse me for any misunderstanding or English mistake.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
TeTeC said:
The question is : Is this seems to be right?

Assuming you are satisfied that the algebra is correct, think about what must happen to h relative to the height of the upper (superior) hole as the height of the lower (inferior) hole goes to zero. What about other changes in the heights of the two holes, such as when they get very close together? Do the corresponding changes in h seem reasonable based on how you expect x to vary for each hole as h varies? Does your result suggest that h ever changes in a way that seems unrealistic? If the algebra looks correct, and the result does not imply anything unreasonable, believe it.
 
TeTeC said:
h=y_{{i}}+y_{{s}}
i agree! this result is very interesting. (i checked your work, and it seems correct.)
 
Thanks for the answers. :wink:

OlderDan, I've been trying to answer your questions to myself, and I've found nothing paradoxal... So I believe it. :shy:

As the algebra seems correct, the best thing I could do is trying to experimentally check the result... A bottle of water should give me something similar.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top