MHB Height of Rocket Over Sloping Ground - PRECAL INVERSE FUNCTION PROBLEM

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

PRECAL INVERSE FUNCTION PROBLEM PLEASE HELP?


Clovis is standing at the edge of a cliff, which slopes 4 feet downward from him for every 1 horizontal foot. He launches a small model rocket from where he is standing.

With the origin of the coordinate system located where he is standing, and the x-axis extending horizontally, the path of the rocket is described by the formula y= -2x^2 + 120x.

a.) Give a function h = f(x) relating the height h of the rocket above the sloping ground to its x-coordinate.

0 = -2x^2 +124

b.) Find the maximum height of the rocket above the sloping ground. What is its x-coordinate when it is at its maximum height?

MAX: 31, 1922

c.) Clovis measures its height h of the rocket above the sloping ground while it is going up. Give a function x = g(h) relating the x-coordinate of the rocket to h.

The maximum I get for the rocket is (31, 1922)
I am pretty sure it is right because the answer in the back of the book is 31 - 1/2 sqrt3844 - 2h
so the 31 is probably correct!
I just need the answer to C (obviously), I'd really appreciate it if you could guide me through it rather than just answers.
Please no use of Calculus terms, I am in Precalc.

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Robin,

We are given the trajectory of the rocket as:

$$h(x)=-2x^2+120x$$

And we may model the surface of the ground by observing it passes through the origin of our coordinate system and has a slope of $-4$. Thus the "ground" function is:

$$g(x)=-4x$$

a.) Give a function h = f(x) relating the height h of the rocket above the sloping ground to its x-coordinate.

The height of the rocket above the ground at $x$ is the difference between the two functions:

$$f(x)=h(x)-g(x)=\left(-2x^2+120x \right)-(-4x)=-2x^2+124x=2x(62-x)$$

I think you meant to give this but simply made a typo and left off the variable of the linear term.

b.) Find the maximum height of the rocket above the sloping ground. What is its x-coordinate when it is at its maximum height?

From part a) we see the two roots of $f(x)$ are:

$$x=0,\,62$$

Now, we know the axis of symmetry, along which the vertex lies, will be midway between the roots. Using the mid-point formula, we then find the axis of symmetry is:

$$x=\frac{0+62}{2}=31$$

The height at the value of $x$ is:

$$f(31)=2\cdot31(62-31)=2\cdot31^2=1922$$

Hence:

$$f_{\max}=f(31)=1922$$

We have found that the rocket reaches a maximum height of 1922 ft at a horizontal distance of 31 ft from the origin.

This agrees with what you found. (Clapping)

c.) Clovis measures its height h of the rocket above the sloping ground while it is going up. Give a function x = g(h) relating the x-coordinate of the rocket to h.

Recall we found:

$$f(x)=-2x^2+124x$$

Arrange in standard quadratic form:

$$2x^2-124x+f=0$$

Application of the quadratic formula yields:

$$x=\frac{124\pm\sqrt{(-124)^2-4(2)(f)}}{2(2)}=\frac{62\pm\sqrt{3844-2f}}{2}$$

Now, since $f$ is not a one-to-one function, we must observe that the relevant domain of $f$ is $$0\le x\le62$$ and so we must take the branch:

$$x=\frac{62-\sqrt{3844-2f}}{2}=31-\frac{\sqrt{3844-2f}}{2}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top