Heim theory - Recent development + Opinion

  • Thread starter Thread starter jirka.win
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
jirka.win
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So after browsing through the internet I stumbled upon something called Heim theory.
To me it seems like something between string theory and relativity.
But there seems to be a significant lack of information considering the details, recent development or basis of a criticism (well apart from fact that it has no experimental backing at all, but that could be because no one did serious research).
Also I would like to ask about your opinion on the matter because there is never too much of a feedback.
Also please put some links regarding data you used to reach your conclusion, in your opinion posts as that would me help a lot during forming of my own stance on the matter.
Thank you a lot for your posts and remember: More data never hurts!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why the interest?
 
jirka.win said:
To me it seems like something between string theory and relativity.

No, it's more between crackpottery and insanity.

It is in gross violation with many different experimental results, so is not taken seriously by anyone. You can search PF for specific examples.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Back
Top