Hello SPS, from physicsforums.com

  • Thread starter Thread starter chroot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hello
chroot
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
10,266
Reaction score
45
Hello sci.physics.strings!

I'm Warren (aka "chroot"), co-administrator of www.physicsforums.com, a site devoted to enabling global scientific communication for both professionals and laypeople.

As part of our service to the professional physics community, we are providing a web-based interface to the two moderated physics newsgroups, sci.physics.research and sci.physics.strings.

LATEX MATH RENDERING

Our web-based interface is special because it is capable of parsing LaTeX mathematics directly from a usenet post and displaying them as real images. As you all know, string theory is couched in very notationally-complex mathematics, and our forum software allows you to communicate that mathematical content effectively.

Our site uses a heuristic approach to locate math in a post and render it properly. For example, our latex parser will automatically identify small piece of math like G^{\mu\nu} and even longer ones like \gamma \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} and display them properly, inlined with the text. It will also properly identify display-mode math, like this:

e^x = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{x^n}{n!} = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} (1+x/n)^n

Because it is a heuristic search, it will invariably make some mistakes. In particular, it can be confused by improper LaTeX code, but does its best to figure out what the user intended. It will never fail on properly-formatted LaTeX.

On physicsforums.com, we simply delimit sections of LaTeX with [ tex ] and [ /tex ] tags (without spaces) for display-mode TeX and [ itex ] and [ /itex ] tags (without spaces) for inline TeX. When you compose a post on physicsforums.com, please use those tags to properly delimit your LaTeX. You will find that usenet posts originating on pf will have those tags removed to make it easier for the general public to understand the message.

MODERATION AND POSTING

Sci.physics.strings is a strictly-moderated discussion group. While physicsforums.com is well-moderated, it is not as strongly moderated as is sci.physics.strings. Physicsforums.com in no way avoids the sci.physics.strings moderators. Here is how posting occurs on physicsforums.com:

1) The user composes a post, and it is stored on our forum software normally.
2) Every ten minutes, our forum software syncs with the usenet server, and uploads any new posts.
3) When a post is sent to the usenet server (and from there to the sps moderators), it is "soft-deleted" from our forum, and will no longer appear to users.
4) When the post is accepted by the sps moderator and received back from the usenet, the post is "un-deleted" on our forum, and will reappear in its original form.

In other words, posts made through physicsforums.com are not visible even on physicsforums.com itself unless the sps moderator accepts them. Our goal on physicsforums.com is to provide a 1:1 correspondence with the usenet group itself.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to thank Eric Forgy for his many excellent ideas about to integrate physicsforums.com with the usenet. I would also like to thank Lubos Motl, Urs Schreiber, Haelfix, and the many regular contributors to sci.physics.research and sci.physics.strings who are helping to make physicsforums.com the best it can be!

CONCLUSION

Please give our service a try! You can view (and post to) sci.physics.strings here:

https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=122

Please let me know if you have any comments or questions! You can email me directly at craddock@vt.edu, or send me a private message on physicsforums.com as "chroot."

- Warren
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hello Warren and the physicsforums.com team!

Thank you for providing this valuable resource for the physics community. The ability to easily display complex mathematical equations is incredibly helpful in discussing and understanding string theory. I appreciate the efforts you have taken to integrate with the usenet groups and provide a seamless experience for users.

I will definitely check out the forum and consider using it for future discussions on sci.physics.strings. Thank you for all the hard work and dedication you have put into this project. I'm sure it will be a valuable tool for many in the physics community.

 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
25K
Replies
4
Views
4K
2
Replies
86
Views
22K
  • Sticky
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
61
Views
12K
Back
Top