HELP A problem on quantitative aspects of electrolysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the volume of hydrogen gas produced during electrolysis after depositing copper. The user initially attempted to use the ideal gas law but was unsure about determining the number of moles of hydrogen gas generated. It was clarified that the moles of hydrogen gas correspond to half the moles of electrons involved in the reaction. The conversation emphasized using Faraday's law of electrolysis for a systematic approach to such problems. Ultimately, the user was encouraged to plug the calculated moles of hydrogen into the ideal gas equation to find the volume.
Kudo Shinichi
Messages
104
Reaction score
1
HELP!A problem on quantitative aspects of electrolysis

Homework Statement


A quantity of electric charge brings about the deposition of 3.34 g Cu at a cathode during the electrolysis of a solution containing Cu2+(aq).
What volume of H2(g) measured at 27.8oC and 767 mmHg, would be produced by this same quantity of electric charge in the reduction of H+(aq) at a cathode?


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't really know the formula for solving the volume in the electrolysis.
The way I approached this problem is by using the ideal gas law(but I don't think it is the right way):
PV=nRT
2H++2e--->H2(g)
we are trying to solve for V, so
V=?
P=767mmHg
R=62.36367L·mmHg·K−1·mol−1
n=2
T=300.95K
plug the numbers into the equation and I got V=48.94L

Can someone please help me with it? Is it the right way for solving the problem? thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Well, you got the part about using the ideal gas law to get the volume.
But how much gas did you create? n is the number of moles of gas.

First, how many moles of copper did you produce?
How many moles of electrons does that correspond to?
How many moles of hydrogen gas do you get per mol of electrons?
 


alxm said:
Well, you got the part about using the ideal gas law to get the volume.
But how much gas did you create? n is the number of moles of gas.

First, how many moles of copper did you produce?
How many moles of electrons does that correspond to?
How many moles of hydrogen gas do you get per mol of electrons?

there are 0.052 moles of copper
0.103 moles of electrons (2 electrons transferred in copper)

I am not really sure about the moles of hydrogen gas but since there are 2 moles of electrons and 1 moles of hydrogen gas, I think that the moles of hydrogen gas is 1/2 of the moles of electrons which is 0.0515
is it right? and do i just plug the moles of hydrogen gas into the ideal gas equation?
 


Kudo Shinichi said:
there are 0.052 moles of copper
0.103 moles of electrons (2 electrons transferred in copper)

I am not really sure about the moles of hydrogen gas but since there are 2 moles of electrons and 1 moles of hydrogen gas, I think that the moles of hydrogen gas is 1/2 of the moles of electrons which is 0.0515
is it right? and do i just plug the moles of hydrogen gas into the ideal gas equation?

Right, two electrons are used in both reactions so nCu = nH2.
And you put that into the ideal gas equation to get the volume.
 


Kudo, read about Faraday's law of electrolysis. It won't give different result, as it is basically identical to what you did, it is just a systematic way of doing this type of questions.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top