HELP : Centre of mass and Centre of gravity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between the center of mass (C.M) and the center of gravity (C.G). While some participants argue they are essentially the same, others emphasize that they differ in terms of gravitational force distribution. The C.G is defined as the point where the net gravitational force can be considered to act, affecting torque calculations. In uniform gravitational fields, the C.M and C.G coincide, but they are not identical concepts. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate physics applications.
garyljc
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
hello ,
could anyone explain to me the difference between
a.) the centre of mass
b.) the centre of gravity

much aprreciated =) Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There isn't really any.

The terms are just used differently depending on context, but it's the same thing
 
No, they are not the same.
The centre of gravity is the point (if it exists) so that if the net gravitational force acting upon the object is considered to act at that point (rather than diffusely distributed at the various mass points the object consists of), then the torque wrt. the C.M of the object is the same as the torque (wrt. C.M.) as calculated for the diffusely distributed gravitational force.

Evidently, for a constant force of gravity, the C.M and the C.G coincide.
 
hmmm sorry but I'm stll a lil confuse , could elaborate slightly more =)
 
garyljc said:
hmmm sorry but I'm stll a lil confuse , could elaborate slightly more =)

see, this is why my explanation was better.

Don't worry about the differences, they're essentially the same thing
 
They are not the same thing.
As measured from the C.M of the object, where \vec{F} is the net (grav.)force on the object, and \vec{\tau} is the net (grav.) torque wrt. to the C.M, we have that that the position of C.G, \vec{r}_{C.G} is given by the formula:
\vec{r}_{C.G}=\frac{\vec{F}\times\vec{\tau}}{|\vec{F}|^{2}}
under the condition \vec{F}\cdot\vec{\tau}=0

It by no means follows that we have \vec{r}_{C.G}=\vec{0}
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top