Help Choosing Between UNC, UC Irvine, and U. of Washington

  • Thread starter Thread starter thomwg11
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on choosing between graduate schools for experimental neutrino physics, specifically UNC, UC Irvine, and U. Wash. The poster is weighing the reputation of the schools against the influence of an established adviser at UNC, who has a strong connection in the neutrino community and is leading a significant project, the Majorana experiment. Participants emphasize the importance of adviser reputation and personal relationships over institutional prestige, suggesting that a supportive adviser can provide valuable opportunities and networking. The potential benefits of working with professors involved in major collaborations at both UC Irvine and UNC are acknowledged, but the consensus leans towards the advantages of having a good relationship with a mentor who is actively engaged in the field. Ultimately, UNC is recommended as the best choice due to the existing rapport with the adviser and the promising prospects associated with the Majorana experiment.
thomwg11
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all. First time poster here. I was hoping that someone could give me some advise about graduate schools. My situation is that I've narrowed down my choices to UNC, UC Irvine, and U. Wash. I'm wanting to work in experimental neutrino physics. My issue is that I'm struggling to decide how my degree will be perceived after graduation. UC Irvine and U. Wash are both bigger names in physics, so I figure that they have that name recognition going for them. A few years ago however, a professor who is relatively well known in the neutrino community moved to UNC, where I worked with him in an REU last summer, and I really enjoyed it. I already have a good relationship with him and he seems to be pushing me hard to choose UNC. So I'm wondering, where does reputation of the adviser rank in importance compared to reputation of the school?

One more thing. At UC Irvine the professor I am looking at working with is the US spokesperson for a large international collaboration (Super K). At UNC the professor is the spokesperson for another larger collaboration (Majorana). Do these offer any benefits? I figure at the least it would help with getting to know people in the field. The Majorana experiment is also just starting to take data, so I have been promised that there are a wealth of opportunities there. Thanks for any advise!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like UNC is your best bet. You for sure know you enjoyed working with this professor at UNC, who's to say what sort of relationship you may have with an adviser at another school? I've heard good things about the Majorana experiment, been to a talk or two about it and what they're looking for. I'd say that the reputation of the adviser is more important; with the physics faculty at my school, they don't talk about other schools, they talk about other researchers. I think having a really good relationship with an adviser already will get you a lot of opportunities earlier on, and with Majorana just starting to take data... If I were in your shoes, I'd do UNC!

Background: Physics undergrad in a school whose reputation for Physics is not well known (more for its Architecture and Engineering programs). I've found the connections professors/faculty have is a lot more important.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top