Help Gravitational Force Question.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the gravitational force exerted on a small mass m placed along the axis of a ring-shaped mass M with radius r. The gravitational force is directed inward along the axis and is given by the formula F = GMmx/(x^2 + r^2)^(3/2). Participants suggest visualizing the ring as composed of small point masses and using symmetry to simplify calculations. By applying the Pythagorean theorem, the distance from each point mass dM to the mass m can be determined, allowing for the summation of forces. The key takeaway is that components of the forces perpendicular to the axis cancel out, leaving only the axial components contributing to the net gravitational force.
eco742
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A mass M is ring shaped with radius r. A small mass m is placed at a distance x along the ring's axis. Show that the gravitational force on the mass m due to the ring is directed inward along the axis and has magnitude

F= GMmx/(x^2+r^2)^3/2

Hints:
-Think of the ring as made up of many small point masses dM
-Sum over the forces due to each dM
-Use symmetry

I am just confused on where to begin! Any help would be greatly apperciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
draw a ring (or a circle) on paper, take one little part of it, the force of that part, which mass is dM is F = GmdM/(L^2), and L is distance from dM to m. You can find this distance using Pythagoras theorem (L^2 = x^2 + r^2). Also notice, that the little element dM has his opposite element on the other side of the circle, which exerts same force (in magnitude) as dM. Draw those two forces in other paper ;] then you maybe notice that component of those forces along rings radius cancels, and stays only the component along rings axis if you sum them.
hope this help a little, I am not very good at writing thoughts ;]
 
To make the problem easier, imagine that instead of a ring you have 4 different masses of mass M/4, at a distance r from the axis. Find the resultant gravity force for each mass M with the mass m at a distance x (don't forget a force is a vector). Then separate all those forces into 2 components: one along the axis, the other perpendicular to it. You will find that all components perpendicular to the axis will cancel each other and the net resultant force will be the sum of all the ones parallel to the axis.
 
Great, thanks that was helpful!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top