Help me understand magnetic flux linkage

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of magnetic flux linkage, specifically addressing the formula used to calculate it and the implications of including the area of a coil that contains empty space. Participants explore the relationship between magnetic field strength, area, and the number of coils in the context of electromagnetic induction.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the area of a single coil includes the entire cross-section, including empty space, when calculating magnetic flux linkage.
  • Another participant explains that magnetic flux is a scalar product of the magnetic field vector and the normal vector to the surface, suggesting that the presence of empty space does not negate its contribution to the calculation.
  • It is noted that a greater number of magnetic field lines passing through a surface correlates with increased magnetic flux linkage and, consequently, more electron movement in the conductor.
  • A participant seeks clarification on the definition of the normal vector to the surface.
  • Further explanation is provided regarding the importance of the orientation of magnetic field lines relative to the normal vector for maximizing magnetic flux, including the effect of inclination on the calculation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple viewpoints regarding the role of empty space in magnetic flux calculations and the interpretation of the normal vector. There is no consensus reached on the implications of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the relationship between the orientation of magnetic field lines and the calculation of magnetic flux, including the effects of inclination, without resolving the underlying assumptions about the role of empty space in the area calculation.

Bradley Tafe
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Magnetic flux linkage = BAN
B=magnetic field strength per unit area
A=Area of conductor moved through the magnetic field
N=Number of coils

I don't understand when my physics textbook says the area of a single coil of wire moved through the magnetic field is π×radius of coil^2 as most of the coil is just empty space.

So why does the A include the entier cross section of the coil, including the empty space? Surely empty space moving through a magnetic field has no effect on magnetic flux linkage? Yet the formula includes this empty space.

What is the reason for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the reason is due to the concept of flux: it is a scalar product of the vectorial field with the normal vector to the surface.
That is it is important to know how many lines of field pass through the surface, also if it is empty.
 
More lines of field enter, more intensive is the magnetic field and its linkage, that is electromagnetic induction, and then more electrons move into the coin.
 
Thank you for your response Pierce610. What is the normal vector to the surface?
 
It is a vector perpendicular to a surface which transform a scalar entity, the surface, in a vector.
 
It means that, like in the static of fluid, it is important that the lines of the fields are parallel to the the normal vector or perpendicular to the surface, it is the same, to transfer a maximum intensity of the field.
If the lines are inclinated it need to modulate (attenuate) the field multiply it by cosinus of the angle due to inclination.
Obviously in this condition the flux, B A cos x, is decreased.
 
Thank you Pierce610
 
Nice to help you.
Bye
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
990
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 194 ·
7
Replies
194
Views
23K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K