Help Needed for Grade 11 Physics Assignment & Interference Pattern Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter antiflag403
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a Grade 11 physics assignment involving a candle and a converging mirror. The user calculates the image height using the mirror formula and magnification but questions the accuracy of their result of -0.32 cm. They also inquire about the interference pattern of water through two openings, specifically whether the second nodal line at 50 degrees corresponds to n=1 or n=1/2. Suggestions include solving the image problem backwards to clarify the sign and magnitude of the answer. The conversation highlights common challenges in understanding optics and wave interference concepts.
antiflag403
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hey all,
Grade 11 physics assignment due tmrw and I am having some trouble. Any help would be appreciated. So here it is:

A candle of height 4.8 cm is placed 38.6 cm in front of a converging mirror with curvature 30.2 cm. What is the height of the image?

Heres what I have:

1/f = 1/Di + 1/ Do so... 1/15.1 = 1/Di + 1/38.6 so Di=2.56

then...

Hi/Ho = -Di/Do so... Hi/4.8 = -2.56/38.6 so Hi=-.32

where:
Ho= Height of object (candle)
Do= Distance of object
Di= Distance of image
Hi= Height of image
f=focus (which i have calculated to be 15.1)

The answer i get is -.32cm which doesn't seem right to me. Am i doing something wrong? Missing something??

As well... a totally unrelated question- When looking at interference patterns of water through 2 openings, if the second nodal line is formed at an angle of 50 degrees, will n=1 or n=1/2?

Thanks for any help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you unsure of the sign or the magnitude of your answer? Or both?
 
Try solving the image problem backwards.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top