Easy Tips for Normalizing Negative Data: Plotting a Normal Distribution Graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter Weirdzzl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data
AI Thread Summary
To normalize a set of negative values for plotting a normal distribution graph, traditional methods like (X-mu)/sigma may not be effective due to the inherent nature of the data. Transforming the data using a function y = f(x) is necessary to achieve a normal distribution, but the choice of function depends on the original distribution and the context of the data. Understanding the graphical attributes and statistical characteristics of the data is crucial for selecting the appropriate transformation. Simply applying an exponential function may not suffice without considering these factors. Normalizing negative data is a complex process that requires careful analysis and consideration.
Weirdzzl
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi all, i got a set of negative values ranging from -0.0001 to -0.3. How do i effectively make them easier to compare and plot a normal distribution graph. can i just do exponential on the values? Thank you for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Weirdzzl.

Usually normalizing distributions involves calculating (X-mu)/sigma where if X is Normally distributed, then the result will give N(0,1) or a normalized normal.

Since your data is all negative it is not likely (especially if the sample size is big) that your distribution is normal.

If you want to make it normal you need to transform your data by some function y = f(x) where you apply the function f to all your sample points.

Doing this will depend on the nature of the distribution you have for your sample and what kind of distribution (i.e. population model) you assume the sample belongs to).

This requires graphical attributes of the distribution as well as knowledge about statistics, the nature of the data, and the context of the system that the data belongs in.

In short, it is not a trivial matter.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Back
Top