Can These Second Order ODEs Model Planetary Trajectories?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2nd order Odes
Marin
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody!

Here are two ODE 2nd order I tried to solve, but I failed :(

r''[t] - k/(r[t])^2 = 0

xy''[x] = ay[x] + b

Could anyone of you please help me?

Thanks in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the independent variable, t, does not appear in the first problem, it can be handled by "quadrature". Let u= r'. r"= u' and, by the chain rule, u'= du/dt= (du/dr)(dr/dt)= ru'. The equation for u is then ru'+ k/r^2= 0 which can be solved by a direct integration: ru'= -k/r^2 so u'= -k/r^3= -kr^(-3) and, finally, du= -kr^(-3)dr. Integrating, r'= u= (1/2)kr^(-2)+ C. That is a separable equation for r:
\frac{dr}{(1/2)kr^{-2}+ C}= \frac{r^2 dr}{(1/2)k+ Cr^2}= dt
You may find the left side of that to be a very difficult integration.

As for the second, xy"= ay+ b, that is a linear differential equation with constant coefficients. It probably would be simplest to do this by taking y to be a Taylor's series solution. Since the leading coefficient is x, you will have to use Frobenius' method: let
y= \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n x^{n+c}[/itex] where c is an unknown number, not necessarily positive or integer. Do the differentiations term by term, put into the equation and assume that a<sub>0</sub> is <b>not</b> 0 to get an equation for c (the &quot;indicial&quot; equation). They try to get a recurrance relation for a<sub>n</sub>.
 
" Let u= r'. r"= u' and, by the chain rule, u'= du/dt= (du/dr)(dr/dt)= ru'. "

u= r' - they are both functions of t, aren't they?
r"= u' is ok
u'= du/dt= (du/dr)(dr/dt) - chain rule is ok, but how do you get to this:
u'= ru' from the chain rule?

As to the integral: I got:

t = r/C - Sqrt(k/(2C^3))*arctan(r*Sqrt(2C/k)) + C_1

now it's ok, but I cannot find r(t) :( and I need it, because the DE is Newton's 2nd Law applied to the gravitational force, considered k = GM ( M- mass, and G the grav. constant)

mr''[t] = GMm/r^2[t] <=> r''[t] - k/r^2[t] = 0

I was expecting ellipses or the conical intersections


2. DE: unfortunately I haven't learned how to solve DEs with power series :( but I'll try the ansatz and see what will come out :)
 
[EDIT]: it should be: mr''[t] = - GMm/r^2[t] and k = -GM , but 'k' is a constant nevertheless :)
 
Marin said:
" Let u= r'. r"= u' and, by the chain rule, u'= du/dt= (du/dr)(dr/dt)= ru'. "

u= r' - they are both functions of t, aren't they?
r"= u' is ok
u'= du/dt= (du/dr)(dr/dt) - chain rule is ok, but how do you get to this:
u'= ru' from the chain rule?
Sorry, I miswrote: u' (du/dr)(dr/dt)= u du/dr The equation becomes u du/dr= k/r2 so u du= k r-2 dr which gives (1/2)u^2= -k/r+ C or
u= dr/dt= \sqrt{C- 2k/r}

As to the integral: I got:

t = r/C - Sqrt(k/(2C^3))*arctan(r*Sqrt(2C/k)) + C_1

now it's ok, but I cannot find r(t) :( and I need it, because the DE is Newton's 2nd Law applied to the gravitational force, considered k = GM ( M- mass, and G the grav. constant)

mr''[t] = GMm/r^2[t] <=> r''[t] - k/r^2[t] = 0

I was expecting ellipses or the conical intersections


2. DE: unfortunately I haven't learned how to solve DEs with power series :( but I'll try the ansatz and see what will come out :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is the following linear Volterra equation of the second kind $$ y(x)+\int_{0}^{x} K(x-s) y(s)\,{\rm d}s = 1 $$ with kernel $$ K(x-s) = 1 - 4 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \dfrac{1}{\lambda_n^2} e^{-\beta \lambda_n^2 (x-s)} $$ where $y(0)=1$, $\beta>0$ and $\lambda_n$ is the $n$-th positive root of the equation $J_0(x)=0$ (here $n$ is a natural number that numbers these positive roots in the order of increasing their values), $J_0(x)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind of zero order. I...
Are there any good visualization tutorials, written or video, that show graphically how separation of variables works? I particularly have the time-independent Schrodinger Equation in mind. There are hundreds of demonstrations out there which essentially distill to copies of one another. However I am trying to visualize in my mind how this process looks graphically - for example plotting t on one axis and x on the other for f(x,t). I have seen other good visual representations of...
Back
Top